Impacts of Emerging Technologies on Multinational Enterprises: Legal Challenges and Opportunities

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 1458 – 1501, 31.12.2023

Meltem Karatepe Kaya

https://doi.org/10.56701/shd.1389227

Öz

This paper examines the application of new technologies in addressing the conventional legal challenges encountered by multinational companies due to the principles of company law. These challenges often give rise to concerns regarding liability in the presence of human rights violations and environmental violations caused by multinational enterprises (MNEs).
Governments worldwide are responding by crafting domestic and international regulations aimed at addressing MNEs’ transgressions, particularly in the domains of environmental protection and human rights. The European Commission’s proposal for a Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) is a notable example. It mandates comprehensive due diligence measures that transcend geographical boundaries, encompassing every facet of a company’s value chain. Nevertheless, while significant, the directive grapples with criticisms surrounding liability resolution.
This article takes an innovative approach, seeking solutions within technology. It commences by introducing MNEs elucidating their operation domains and contributions to the global economy. Subsequently, it investigates environmental and human rights transgressions committed by MNEs, unraveling the enduring responsibilities and liabilities inherent to their operations. In doing so, it explores an alternative path forward, one that harnesses technology’s transformative potential to address the complex challenges MNEs and countries face in an evolving global landscape.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Multinational enterprises (MNEs), Emerging Technologies, Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, Blockchain, Artificial Intelligence

Kaynakça

  • Agmon, Tamir – Kallir, Ido. ‘Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT): A Game Changer for MNEs in Emerging Markets’. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 15/580, (2022).
  • Akey, Pat – Appel, Ian.‘The Limits of Limited Liability: Evidence from Industrial Pollution’. Journal of Finance, American Finance Association 76/1, (2021), 5-55.
  • Allen, Darcy W. E. et al., ‘The Governance of Blockchain Dispute Resolution’, Harvard Negotiation Law Review 25/75, (2019).
  • Alshbili, Ibrahem et al. ‘Social and Environmental Reporting, Sustainable Development and Institutional Voids: Evidence from A Developing Country’. Corporate Social Responsibility Environmental Management 28, (2021).
  • Aouidef, Yann et al. ‘Decentralized Justice: A Comparative Analysis of Blockchain Online Dispute Resolution Projects’. Frontiers in Blockchain, 4/2, (2021).
  • Armour, John et al. ‘Green Pills: Making Corporate Climate Commitments Credible’. European Corporate Governance Institute (2022) – Law Working Paper No. 657/2022.
  • Armour, John – Eidenmüller, Horst. ‘Self-driving corporations?’. Harvard Business Law Review 10 (2020).
  • Armour, John et al. ‘Putting Technology to Good Use for Society: The Role of Corporate, Competition and Tax Law’. J. BRIT. ACAD. 6/285, (2018), 294–295.
  • Ashour, Samar. ‘Artificial Intelligence in The Boardroom: An Outright Exposure to Directorial Liability?’. Oxford Law Faculty, 2020. https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/business-law-blog/blog/2020/10/artificial-intelligence-boardroom-outright-exposure-directorial
  • Backer, Larry Catá. ‘Regulating Multinational Corporations: Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities’. The Brown Journal of World Affairs 22/1, (2015), 156.
  • Balseiro, Carlos F. et al. ‘Tracking the Prestige Oil Spill: An Operational Experience In Simulation At Meteogalicia’. Weather 58, (2003).
  • Bayram, Orkun. ‘Importance of Blockchain Use in Cross-Border Payments and Evaluation of the Progress in This Area’. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi 21/171, (2020).
  • Bonfanti, Angelica. Accountability of Multinational Corporations for Human Rights and Environmental Abuse: How Far Can Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Go? Rethinking International Law and Justice. London: Routledge, 2015.
  • Buchwald, Michael. ‘Smart Contract Dispute Resolution: The Inescapable Flaws of Blockchain-Based Arbitration’. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 168, (2020), 1369-1423.
  • Castanedo, Sonia et al. ‘The Prestige Oil Spill in Cantabria (Bay of Biscay). Part I: Operational Forecasting System for Quick Response, Risk Assessment, and Protection of Natural Resources’. Journal of Coastal Research 22, (2006), 1474-1489.
  • Choi, Sanghak – Jung, Hail. ‘Effects of the litigation risk coverage on corporate social responsibility’. Applied Economics Letters 28/ 21, (2020), 1836-1841.
  • Clapp, Jennifer – Dauvergne, Peter. Paths to a Green World: The Political Economy of the Global Environment. Cambridge:The MIT Press, 2005.
  • Clive-Matthews, James. ‘A Brief History of Tech Skepticism’. Strategy+business, 5 May 2023. https://www.strategy-business.com/article/A-brief-history-of-tech-skepticism&gt.
  • Cravino, Javier – Levchenko, Andrei A. ‘Multinational Firms and International Business Cycle Transmission’. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 132/2, (2017), 921-962.
  • Davis, Matthew et al. ‘Can blockchain-technology fight corruption in MNEs’ operations in emerging markets?’. Review of International Business and Strategy, (2021).
  • De Backer, Koen et al. ‘Multinational Enterprises In The Global Economy | VOX, CEPR Policy Portal’. VoxEU, 19 July 2023. https://voxeu.org/article/multinational-enterprises-global-economy.
  • Diamantis, Mihailis. ‘Algorithms Acting Badly: A Solution from Corporate Law’. SSRN Electronic Journal 89/4 (2020), 801–856. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3545436
  • Dunning, John H. – Lundan, Sarianna M. Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2nd Ed., 2008.
  • Eberlein, Burkard – Matten, Dirk. ‘Business responses to climate change regulation in Canada and Germany: lessons for MNCs from emerging economies’. J. Bus. Ethics 86/2, (2009), 241-255.
  • Eidenmüller, Horst. ‘Shell Shock: In Defence Of The ‘Real Seat Theory’ In International Company Law’. Oxford Law Faculty, 2022. https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/business-law-blog/blog/2022/03/shell-shock-defence-real-seat-theory-international-company-law
  • Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. ‘Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review’. The Academy of Management Review 14, (1989).
  • Enriques, Luca – Gatti, Matteo. ‘The Extraterritorial Impact of the Proposed EU Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence: Why Corporate America Should Pay Attention’. Oxford Law Faculty, 2022. https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/business-law-blog/blog/2022/04/extraterritorial-impact-proposed-eu-directive-corporate
  • Enriques, Luca – Zetzsche, Dirk. ‘Corporate Technologies and the Tech Nirvana Fallacy’, Hastings Law Journal 72/1, (2020), 55-98.
  • Eroğlu, Muzaffer. Multinational Enterprises and Tort Liabilities. Northampton: Edward Elgar, 1st Ed, 2008.
  • Evans, Tonya M. ‘The Role of International Rules in Blockchain-Based Cross-Border Commercial Disputes’. Wayne L. Rev. 65/1, (2019).
  • Golson, Thomas. ‘Multinational Corporations and Liability According to International Law – Writing Anthology’. Central.edu, 2022. https://central.edu/writing-anthology/2019/05/31/multinational-corporations-and-liability-according-to-international-law/
  • Hansen, Jesper Lau. ‘Unsustainable Sustainability’. ECGI 2022. https://ecgi.global/blog/unsustainable-sustainability
  • Hill, Jennifer. ‘Changes in the Role of the Shareholder’ in Ross Grantham and Charlie Rickett (eds), Corporate Personality in the 20th Century. Oxford: Hart, 1998.
  • Hood, Neil – Young, Stephen. The Economics of Multinational Enterprise. Longman, 1979.
  • Hotten, Russell. ‘Volkswagen: The Scandal Explained’. BBC News, 2015. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-34324772
  • Howell, Bronwyn E. – Potgieter, Petrus H., ‘Uncertainty and Dispute Resolution for Blockchain and Smart Contract Institutions’. Journal of Institutional Economics 17, (2021).
  • Huang, D. ‘Reasons and Suggestions of Human Rights Violations Committed by Mnes’. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management 7/108, (2023).
  • Gerner-Beuerle, Carsten et al. The Private International Law of Companies in Europe. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2019.
  • Gillpatrick, Tom, et al. ‘How Can Blockchain Contribute to Developing Country Economies? A Literature Review on Application Areas’. Economics 10/1, (2022).
  • Goodenough, Oliver – Burke Catherine. “dOrg Launches First Limited Liability DAO” (Gravel & Shea, June 2019). https://www.gravelshea.com/2019/06/dorg-launches-first-limited-liability-dao/?source=post_page
  • Guillaume, Florence – Riva, Sven. Blockchain Dispute Resolution For Decentralized Autonomous Organizations: The Rise Of Decentralized Autonomous Justice. Blockchain And Private International Law, ed. Andrea Bonomi – Matthias Lehmann. Brill Nijhoff, 2022.
  • Graham, August. ‘Oil Giant Shell Chooses UK For Tax Residency and Drops ‘Royal Dutch’ From Name’. independent.co.uk, 2022. https://www.independent.co.uk/business/oil-giant-shell-chooses-uk-for-tax-residency-and-drops-royal-dutch-from-name-b1957935.html
  • ILO, International Labour Organization. Statistics on the Contribution of Multinational Enterprises to Inclusive and Sustainable Economic Growth, Full and Productive Employment and Decent Work for All (2022). https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—dgreports/—stat/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_635202.pdf
  • ILO, International Labour Organization. Tripartite Declaration of Principles Concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy. Geneva, 2022. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—ed_emp/—emp_ent/—multi/documents/publication/wcms_094386.pdf
  • International Labour Organization ILO, Tripartite Declaration of Principles Concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy (Geneva, 2022).
  • Ishaque, Shabnsm. ‘The Liability of Parent Companies for the Obligations of Their Subsidiaries in the Context of Multinational Groups’. PLR 5 (2010), 137.
  • Ito, Hisaei – Watanabe, Hiroyuki. ‘Piercing the Corporate Veil’, Comparative Company Law: A Case-Based Approach’ ed. Mathias Siems – David Cabrelli. (2018), 211-249.
  • Ivanaj, Silvester et al. ‘MNEs and climate change: Implications for future research’. Journal of Cleaner Production 160, (2017), 1-7.
  • Ivanaj, Vera et al., ‘Understanding MNEs' attitudes towards CSR: a literature review and research agenda’. Rev. Org. Responsab 8/2, (2013), 15-30.
  • İspirli Armağan, Merve. Uluslararası Hukukta Çok Uluslu Şirketler ve İnsan Hakları Yükümlülükleri. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 2019.
  • Kaal, Wulf A. ‘Blockchain-Based Corporate Governance’. U of St. Thomas (Minnesota) Legal Studies, Research Paper No. 19-05, (2019).
  • Kandemir, Hatice Kübra. ‘Sürdürülebı̇lı̇r Şı̇rketler ve Hukukı̇ Çerçevesı̇’. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 20/41 (2021).
  • Kaya, Serkan. ‘Blokzincir Tabanlı Akıllı Sözleşmelerden Doğan Uyuşmazlıkların Çözümü’. Medeni Usul ve İcra İflas Hukuku Dergisi 18/52, (2022).
  • Kaya, Serkan – Maviş, Kadirhan. ‘Blokzincir Teknolojilerinin Uyuşmazlık Çözüm Sistemleri Üzerindeki Etkisi: Merkezi Olmayan Adalet Sistemi’. Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 2/10, (2022).
  • Kaya, Serkan – Şahin Şentürk, Eda. ‘Global Class Actions: Towards a Blockchain-Based Dispute Resolution System’. Journal Consumer Policy (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-023-09553-8
  • Kelsey, Tom. ‘The present and future of techno-scepticism: two books on the dangers of technology’. Renewal: a Journal of Social Democracy 26/4, (2018), 92-95.
  • Khare, Anshuman et al. Sustainable International Business Models in a Digitally Transforming World. London: Routledge, 2022.
  • Kleinert, Jörn et al. ‘The Few Leading the Many: Foreign Affiliates and Business Cycle Comovement’. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 7/4, (2015), 134-59.
  • Kraakman, Reinier et al. The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2017.
  • Kyove, Justine et al. ‘Globalization Impact on Multinational Enterprises’. World 2/2 (15 April 2021), 216–230. https://doi.org/10.3390/world2020014
  • Jensen, Michael C. ‘Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function’. Business Ethics Quarterly 12/2, (2002), 235-256.
  • Lafarre, Anne. ‘Mandatory Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence in Europe: The Way Forward’. ECGI 2022. https://ecgi.global/blog/mandatory-corporate-sustainability-due-diligence-europe-way-forward.
  • Lafarre, Anne – Van der Elst, Christoph. ‘The Viability of Blockchain in Corporate Governance’ ECGI Working Paper Series in Law 712 (2023), https://www.ecgi.global/sites/default/files/working_papers/documents/theviabilityofblockchainincorporategovernance_0.pdf.
  • Liu, Shaojun. (2021). Code Is Law. In: Rights Limitation in Digital Age. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4380-4_7
  • Lopes, Alexsandro Broede – Walker, Martin. ‘Asset Revaluations, Future Firm Performance and Firm-Level Corporate Governance Arrangements: New Evidence from Brazil’. The British Accounting Review, 44 (2012).
  • Low, Kelvin F.K, et al. The company and blockchain technology. Northampton:Edward Elgard Handbook on Corporate Liability,. ed. Christian Witting – Martin Petrin. Edward Elgar, 2023.
  • Lowe, Nichola – Kenney, Martin. ‘Foreign Investment and The Global Geography of Production: Why the Mexican Consumer Electronics Industry Failed’. World Development 27, (1999).
  • Masulis, Ronald W. et al. ‘Director Liability Protection and the Quality of Outside Directors’ (December 9, 2020). European Corporate Governance Institute – Finance Working Paper No. 672/2020, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3329220 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3329220.
  • Meyer, Klaus E. et al. ‘Multinational Enterprises and Local Contexts: The Opportunities and Challenges of Multiple Embeddedness’. Journal of Management Studies 48/2 (March 2011), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00968.x
  • Möslein, Florian. ‘Robots in the Boardroom: Artificial Intelligence and Corporate Law’, Research Handbook on the Law of Artificial Intelligence. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2018.
  • Muchlinski, Peter. Multinational Enterprises and the Law. Oxford University Press, 2nd Ed., 2007.
  • Muchlinski, Peter. ‘Limited Liability and Multinational Enterprises: A Case for Reform?’. Cambridge Journal of Economics 34, (2010), 915-928.
  • Murray, Alex et al. ‘Contracting in the Smart Era: The Implications of Blockchain and Decentralized Autonomous Organizations for Contracting and Corporate Governance’. ACAD. MGMT. PERSP. 35, (2021).
  • Narula, Rajneesh – Pineli André. 'Improving the developmental impact of multinational enterprises: policy and research challenges’. Economia e Politica Industriale 46, (2019), 2.
  • Och, Marleen. ‘The Case of the Missing Shareholders in the Proposed Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive. ECGI 2022. https://ecgi.global/blog/case-missing-shareholders-proposed-corporate-sustainability-due-diligence-directive
  • OECD, The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Annual Report on the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. OECD, 2020. https://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/annualreportsontheguidelines.htm
  • OECD, The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Environment and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: Corporate Tools and Approaches. Accessed 3 August 2023. https://www.oecd.org/env/34992954.pdf
  • OECD, The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Multinational Enterprises In The Global Economy: Heavily Debated But Hardly Measured. OECD, 2018. https://www.oecd.org/industry/ind/MNEs-in-the-global-economy-policy-note.pdf
  • OECD, The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, 2011 Edition. OECD, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264115415-en
  • Oetzel, Jennifer – Doh, Jonathan P. 'MNEs and development: a review and reconceptualization'. Journal of World Business 44, (2009).
  • Oliveira, Rui Torres et al. ‘Blockchain and the multinational enterprise: Progress, challenges and future research avenues’. Review of International Business and Strategy 30/2, (2020), 145-161.
  • Rabinovich-Einy, Orna – Katsh, Ethan. ‘Blockchain and the Inevitability of Disputes: The Role for Online Dispute Resolution’. Journal Dispute Resolution 2, (2019), 47-75.
  • Pacces, Alessio M. ‘Supply Chain Liability in The Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive Proposal’. Oxford Law Faculty, 2022. https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/business-law-blog/blog/2022/04/supply-chain-liability-corporate-sustainability-due-diligence
  • Pargendler, Mariana. ‘The EU Proposal on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence and The Mystique of Complete Corporate Separateness’, ECGI 2022. https://ecgi.global/blog/eu-proposal-corporate-sustainability-due-diligence-and-mystique-complete-corporate-separateness?mc_cid=a63892fc3f&mc_eid=cd8cf5092d
  • Pargendler, Mariana. ‘How Universal is the Corporate Form? Reflections on the Dwindling of Corporate Attributes in Brazil’. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 58/1, (2019).
  • Pelker, C. Alden et. al. ‘Using Blockchain Analysis from Investigation to Trial’. DOJ J. FED. L. & PRAC. 69/59, (2021).
  • Petri, Helo – Yuqiuge, Hao. ‘Blockchains in operations and supply chains: A model and reference implementation’. Computers & Industrial Engineering 136, (2019).
  • Petrin, Martin. ‘Corporate Management in the Age of AI’, Columbia Business Law Review 3, (2020), 965–1030.
  • Pinkse, Jonatan – Kolk, Ans. ‘Multinational enterprises and climate change: Exploring institutional failures and embeddedness’. Journal of International Business Studies 43, (2012), 334.
  • Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence and Amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:bc4dcea4-9584-11ec-b4e4-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF
  • Pulaşlı, Hasan. ‘Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Bağlamında Uluslararası İnsan Hakları ve Çevre Standartlarının Çok Uluslu Şirketlerin Merkez Yönetim Organının Hukuki Sorumluluğuna Etkisi’. Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Dergisi 36/4, (2020), 5-37.
  • Reyes, Carla L. ‘Autonomous Corporate Personhood’. Washington Law Review 96/4, (2021).
  • Rooij, Benjamin Van – Brownlee, Megan. ‘Does Tort Deter? Inconclusive empirical evidence about the effect of liability in preventing harmful behavior’. Cambridge Handbook on Compliance, ed. Benjamin Van Rooij – D. Daniel Sokol, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
  • Ruggie, John Gerard. Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights (Norton Global Ethics Series). New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2013.
  • Ruggie, John. ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy: a Framework for Business And Human Rights, Report Of The Special Representative Of The Secretary-General On The Issue Of Human Rights Transantional Corporations And Other Business Enterprises’. U.N. Human Rights Council 8th Session, Agenda item 3 A/HRC/8/5 (7 April 2008), 3.
  • Schmitz, Amy J. – Rule, Colin. ‘Online Dispute Resolution for Smart Contracts’. Journal of Dispute Resolution 2, (2019).
  • Shope, Mark L. ‘Distributed Ledger Technology in International Trade: Rethinking the Role and Necessity of the Customs Declaration’. Stanford Journal of Blockchain Law & Policy 5/1, (2022).
  • Schotter, Andreas –Goodsite, Michael Evan. ‘Interdisciplinary perspectives on competitive climate strategy in multinational corporations’. Thunderbird Int. Bus. Rev. 55/6, (2013), 629-632.
  • Sjåfjell, Beate – Mähönen, Jukka. 'Corporate Purpose and the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Proposal’. ECGI 2022. https://ecgi.global/blog/corporate-purpose-and-eu-corporate-sustainability-due-diligence-proposal
  • Steinhardt, Ralph G. ‘Soft Law, Hard Markets: Comparative Self-Interest and the Emergence of Human Rights Responsibilities for Multinational Corporations’. Brook. J. Int'l L. 33, (2008), 936.
  • Strange, Roger. ‘MNE theory and the importance of corporate governance’. Academy of International Business (AIB) 2016 Annual Meeting, 27-30 Jun 2016, New Orleans.
  • Surden, Harry. ‘Artificial Intelligence And Law: An Overview’, Georgia State University Law Review 35, (2019).
  • Sutherland, Eversheds. 'Brexit Risk For Owners Of English Companies Operating In Germany- Publications – Eversheds Sutherland'. Eversheds-sutherland.com, 2022. https://www.eversheds-sutherland.com/global/en/what/articles/index.page?ArticleID=en/Corporate/Brexit_risk_for_owners_of_English_companies_operating_in_Germany
  • The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), Trustees of Dartmouth Coll. v. Woodward, 17 U.S.518, 636 (1819).
  • Thomsen, Steen. ‘Sustainable Corporate Governance and the Road to Stagnation’. Oxford Law Faculty, 2022. https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/business-law-blog/blog/2022/04/sustainable-corporate-governance-and-road-stagnation
  • Tyrrell, James. “Blockchain-Based Cross-Border Payments – the Ripple Effect” (TechHQ, July 24, 2023). https://techhq.com/2023/07/blockchain-based-cross-border-payments-the-ripple-effect/
  • Yunhan, Duan – Wenjin, Jiang. ‘Research on the Human Rights Responsibility of MNEs’. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research 615, (2021), 1331-1337.
  • UN, United Nations. Multinational Corporations in World Development. New York: UNDESA—United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 1973.
  • Vermont Act No 205 (S.269), An act relating to blockchain business development. https://legislature.vermont.gov/Documents/2018/Docs/ACTS/ACT205/ACT205%20As%20Enacted.pdf
  • Vicente, Lecia. ‘The Hohfeldian Concept of Share in Limited Liability Companies: A View from the Common and Civil Law Traditions’. Tul. Eur. & Civ. L.F. 33, (2018), 41-74
  • Wallach, Omri. ‘The World’s Tech Giants, Compared to the Size of Economies’. Visual Capitalist, 2021. https://www.visualcapitalist.com/the-tech-giants-worth-compared-economies-countries/
  • Welzel, Christian et al. ‘Mythos Blockchain: Herausforderung Für Den Öffentlichen Sektor’. Kompetenzzentrum Öffentliche Informationstechnologie, DIN, (2017).
  • Wu, Jiangong et al. ‘Enterprise data security storage integrating blockchain and artificial intelligence technology in property and resource risk management’. Soft Computing 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-08933-z.
  • Xia, Jianting et al. ‘The Effect of Blockchain Technology on Supply Chain Collaboration: A Case Study of Lenovo’. Systems 11/299, (2023).
  • Zagelmeyer, Stefan –Sinkovics, Rudolf R. ‘MNEs, Human Rights and the SDGs — the Moderating Role of Business and Human Rights Governance’. Transnational Corporations 26/33, (2019).
  • Zetzsche, Dirk A et al. ‘The Distributed Liability of Distributed Ledgers: Legal Risks of Blockchain’. University of Illinois Law Review (2018).
  • Zekos, Georgios. MNEs in the 21st Century. Nova Publishers, 2015.
  • Zhang, Wenbin et al. ‘Blockchain-Based Distributed Compliance in Multinational Corporations’ Cross-Border Intercompany Transactions: A New Model for Distributed Compliance Across Subsidiaries in Different Jurisdictions’. 508–517. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Singapore, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03405-4_20
  • 'Blockchain for Supply Chain- IBM Blockchain’. https://www.ibm.com/blockchain-supply-chain ‘Can Blockchain Revolutionize International Trade?’. Theblockchaintest.com, 2022. https://theblockchaintest.com/uploads/resources/WTO%20-%20Can%20Blockchain%20revolutionize%20international%20trade%20-%202018.pdf
  • ‘Civil Liability in the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive Proposal’. Oxford Law Blogs, September 22, 2023. https://blogs.law.ox.ac.uk/oblb/blog-post/2023/09/civil-liability-eu-corporate-sustainability-due-diligence-directive-proposal
  • 'LVMH Partners with Other Major Luxury Companies on Aura, the First Global Luxury Blockchain – LVMH' (LVMH, April 20, 2021). https://www.lvmh.com/news-documents/news/lvmh-partners-with-other-major-luxury-companies-on-aura-the-first-global-luxury-blockchain/
  • ‘Reino De España V. American Bureau of Shipping, Inc., 729 F. Supp. 2D 635’. Casetext.com, 2010. https://casetext.com/case/reino-de-espana-v-american-bureau-of-shipping
  • ‘Reporting’. Sustainable Performance, 2021. https://sustainable-performance.totalenergies.com/en/reporting. ‘Starbucks C.A.F.E. Practices’. Scsglobalservices, 2019. https://www.scsglobalservices.com/services/starbucks-cafe-practices?scscertified=1 ‘Shell Sustainability Report 2020 – Home’. Reports.shell.com, 2021. https://reports.shell.com/sustainability-report/2022/
  • ‘The Prestige: One Year On, A Continuing Disaster’. wfpanda.org, 2003. https://wwf.panda.org/wwf_news/?9623/The-IPrestigeI-one-year-on-a-continuing-disaster ‘Texts Adopted – Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence – Thursday, 1 June 2023’. European Union, 2023 – Source: European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2023-0209_EN.html
  • ‘Vechain | Blockchain for Our Better World’. vechain, March 9, 2023. https://www.vechain.org
  • ‘Unlimited Personal Liability of Shareholders in Air Berlin PLC as a Result of BREXIT?’. Heuking.de, 2022. https://www.heuking.de/de/news-events/newsletter-fachbeitraege/artikel/unlimited-personal-liability-of-shareholders-in-air-berlin-plc-as-a-result-of-brexit.html

Gelişen Teknolojilerin Çok Uluslu Şirketler Üzerindeki Etkileri: Hukuki Zorluklar ve Fırsatlar

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 1458 – 1501, 31.12.2023

Meltem Karatepe Kaya

https://doi.org/10.56701/shd.1389227

Öz

Bu makale, çok uluslu şirketlerin (MNE’ler) geleneksel şirketler hukuku prensipleri nedeniyle karşılaştığı hukuki zorlukların üstesinden gelmede yeni teknolojilerin uygulanmasının etkinliğini incelemektedir. Şirketlerin sorumlu tutulması konusunda karşılaşılan zorluklar genellikle çok uluslu şirketlerin insan hakları ihlalleri ve çevresel ihlalleri konusunda sorumluluklarıyla ilgili endişelere neden olmaktadır.
Dünya genelindeki hükümetler, sorumluluk sorununu aşabilmek için özellikle çevre koruması ve insan hakları alanlarındaki çok uluslu şirketlerin ihlalleri ile başa çıkmayı amaçlayan iç düzenlemeler ve uluslararası düzenlemeler hazırlamaktadır. Avrupa Komisyonu’nun Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik Yükümlülüklerine İlişkin Tüzük (CSDDD) önerisi bu konuda dikkate değer bir örnektir. Bu düzenleme bir şirketin değer zincirinin her yönünü kapsayan coğrafi sınırları aşan kapsamlı önleyici tedbirler yükümlülüğünü zorunlu kılmaktadır..
Bu makale, çok uluslu şirketlerin sorumlu tutulmasına yönelik sorunlara gelişen teknolojilerin yardımıyla çözümler arayarak yenilikçi bir yaklaşım benimsemektedir. Makale çok uluslu şirketleri tanıtarak başlamakta, işletim alanlarını ve küresel ekonomiye katkılarını açıklamaktadır. Devamında, çok uluslu şirketler tarafından işlenen çevresel ihlalleri ve insan hakları ihlallerini araştırarak bu eylemlerden dolayı sürekli sorumlulukları ve yükümlülükleri ortaya çıkarır. Bu süreçte, çok uluslu şirketler ve ülkelerin küresel peyzajda karşılaştığı zorlukları ele almak için teknolojinin dönüştürücü potansiyelini kullanma fikri makalede değerlendirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çok Uluslu Şirketler, Gelişen Teknolojiler, Sürdürülebilirlik Yükümlülüklerine İlişkin Tüzük, Blokzincir, Yapay Zeka

Kaynakça

  • Agmon, Tamir – Kallir, Ido. ‘Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT): A Game Changer for MNEs in Emerging Markets’. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 15/580, (2022).
  • Akey, Pat – Appel, Ian.‘The Limits of Limited Liability: Evidence from Industrial Pollution’. Journal of Finance, American Finance Association 76/1, (2021), 5-55.
  • Allen, Darcy W. E. et al., ‘The Governance of Blockchain Dispute Resolution’, Harvard Negotiation Law Review 25/75, (2019).
  • Alshbili, Ibrahem et al. ‘Social and Environmental Reporting, Sustainable Development and Institutional Voids: Evidence from A Developing Country’. Corporate Social Responsibility Environmental Management 28, (2021).
  • Aouidef, Yann et al. ‘Decentralized Justice: A Comparative Analysis of Blockchain Online Dispute Resolution Projects’. Frontiers in Blockchain, 4/2, (2021).
  • Armour, John et al. ‘Green Pills: Making Corporate Climate Commitments Credible’. European Corporate Governance Institute (2022) – Law Working Paper No. 657/2022.
  • Armour, John – Eidenmüller, Horst. ‘Self-driving corporations?’. Harvard Business Law Review 10 (2020).
  • Armour, John et al. ‘Putting Technology to Good Use for Society: The Role of Corporate, Competition and Tax Law’. J. BRIT. ACAD. 6/285, (2018), 294–295.
  • Ashour, Samar. ‘Artificial Intelligence in The Boardroom: An Outright Exposure to Directorial Liability?’. Oxford Law Faculty, 2020. https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/business-law-blog/blog/2020/10/artificial-intelligence-boardroom-outright-exposure-directorial
  • Backer, Larry Catá. ‘Regulating Multinational Corporations: Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities’. The Brown Journal of World Affairs 22/1, (2015), 156.
  • Balseiro, Carlos F. et al. ‘Tracking the Prestige Oil Spill: An Operational Experience In Simulation At Meteogalicia’. Weather 58, (2003).
  • Bayram, Orkun. ‘Importance of Blockchain Use in Cross-Border Payments and Evaluation of the Progress in This Area’. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi 21/171, (2020).
  • Bonfanti, Angelica. Accountability of Multinational Corporations for Human Rights and Environmental Abuse: How Far Can Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Go? Rethinking International Law and Justice. London: Routledge, 2015.
  • Buchwald, Michael. ‘Smart Contract Dispute Resolution: The Inescapable Flaws of Blockchain-Based Arbitration’. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 168, (2020), 1369-1423.
  • Castanedo, Sonia et al. ‘The Prestige Oil Spill in Cantabria (Bay of Biscay). Part I: Operational Forecasting System for Quick Response, Risk Assessment, and Protection of Natural Resources’. Journal of Coastal Research 22, (2006), 1474-1489.
  • Choi, Sanghak – Jung, Hail. ‘Effects of the litigation risk coverage on corporate social responsibility’. Applied Economics Letters 28/ 21, (2020), 1836-1841.
  • Clapp, Jennifer – Dauvergne, Peter. Paths to a Green World: The Political Economy of the Global Environment. Cambridge:The MIT Press, 2005.
  • Clive-Matthews, James. ‘A Brief History of Tech Skepticism’. Strategy+business, 5 May 2023. https://www.strategy-business.com/article/A-brief-history-of-tech-skepticism&gt.
  • Cravino, Javier – Levchenko, Andrei A. ‘Multinational Firms and International Business Cycle Transmission’. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 132/2, (2017), 921-962.
  • Davis, Matthew et al. ‘Can blockchain-technology fight corruption in MNEs’ operations in emerging markets?’. Review of International Business and Strategy, (2021).
  • De Backer, Koen et al. ‘Multinational Enterprises In The Global Economy | VOX, CEPR Policy Portal’. VoxEU, 19 July 2023. https://voxeu.org/article/multinational-enterprises-global-economy.
  • Diamantis, Mihailis. ‘Algorithms Acting Badly: A Solution from Corporate Law’. SSRN Electronic Journal 89/4 (2020), 801–856. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3545436
  • Dunning, John H. – Lundan, Sarianna M. Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2nd Ed., 2008.
  • Eberlein, Burkard – Matten, Dirk. ‘Business responses to climate change regulation in Canada and Germany: lessons for MNCs from emerging economies’. J. Bus. Ethics 86/2, (2009), 241-255.
  • Eidenmüller, Horst. ‘Shell Shock: In Defence Of The ‘Real Seat Theory’ In International Company Law’. Oxford Law Faculty, 2022. https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/business-law-blog/blog/2022/03/shell-shock-defence-real-seat-theory-international-company-law
  • Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. ‘Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review’. The Academy of Management Review 14, (1989).
  • Enriques, Luca – Gatti, Matteo. ‘The Extraterritorial Impact of the Proposed EU Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence: Why Corporate America Should Pay Attention’. Oxford Law Faculty, 2022. https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/business-law-blog/blog/2022/04/extraterritorial-impact-proposed-eu-directive-corporate
  • Enriques, Luca – Zetzsche, Dirk. ‘Corporate Technologies and the Tech Nirvana Fallacy’, Hastings Law Journal 72/1, (2020), 55-98.
  • Eroğlu, Muzaffer. Multinational Enterprises and Tort Liabilities. Northampton: Edward Elgar, 1st Ed, 2008.
  • Evans, Tonya M. ‘The Role of International Rules in Blockchain-Based Cross-Border Commercial Disputes’. Wayne L. Rev. 65/1, (2019).
  • Golson, Thomas. ‘Multinational Corporations and Liability According to International Law – Writing Anthology’. Central.edu, 2022. https://central.edu/writing-anthology/2019/05/31/multinational-corporations-and-liability-according-to-international-law/
  • Hansen, Jesper Lau. ‘Unsustainable Sustainability’. ECGI 2022. https://ecgi.global/blog/unsustainable-sustainability
  • Hill, Jennifer. ‘Changes in the Role of the Shareholder’ in Ross Grantham and Charlie Rickett (eds), Corporate Personality in the 20th Century. Oxford: Hart, 1998.
  • Hood, Neil – Young, Stephen. The Economics of Multinational Enterprise. Longman, 1979.
  • Hotten, Russell. ‘Volkswagen: The Scandal Explained’. BBC News, 2015. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-34324772
  • Howell, Bronwyn E. – Potgieter, Petrus H., ‘Uncertainty and Dispute Resolution for Blockchain and Smart Contract Institutions’. Journal of Institutional Economics 17, (2021).
  • Huang, D. ‘Reasons and Suggestions of Human Rights Violations Committed by Mnes’. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management 7/108, (2023).
  • Gerner-Beuerle, Carsten et al. The Private International Law of Companies in Europe. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2019.
  • Gillpatrick, Tom, et al. ‘How Can Blockchain Contribute to Developing Country Economies? A Literature Review on Application Areas’. Economics 10/1, (2022).
  • Goodenough, Oliver – Burke Catherine. “dOrg Launches First Limited Liability DAO” (Gravel & Shea, June 2019). https://www.gravelshea.com/2019/06/dorg-launches-first-limited-liability-dao/?source=post_page
  • Guillaume, Florence – Riva, Sven. Blockchain Dispute Resolution For Decentralized Autonomous Organizations: The Rise Of Decentralized Autonomous Justice. Blockchain And Private International Law, ed. Andrea Bonomi – Matthias Lehmann. Brill Nijhoff, 2022.
  • Graham, August. ‘Oil Giant Shell Chooses UK For Tax Residency and Drops ‘Royal Dutch’ From Name’. independent.co.uk, 2022. https://www.independent.co.uk/business/oil-giant-shell-chooses-uk-for-tax-residency-and-drops-royal-dutch-from-name-b1957935.html
  • ILO, International Labour Organization. Statistics on the Contribution of Multinational Enterprises to Inclusive and Sustainable Economic Growth, Full and Productive Employment and Decent Work for All (2022). https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—dgreports/—stat/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_635202.pdf
  • ILO, International Labour Organization. Tripartite Declaration of Principles Concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy. Geneva, 2022. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—ed_emp/—emp_ent/—multi/documents/publication/wcms_094386.pdf
  • International Labour Organization ILO, Tripartite Declaration of Principles Concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy (Geneva, 2022).
  • Ishaque, Shabnsm. ‘The Liability of Parent Companies for the Obligations of Their Subsidiaries in the Context of Multinational Groups’. PLR 5 (2010), 137.
  • Ito, Hisaei – Watanabe, Hiroyuki. ‘Piercing the Corporate Veil’, Comparative Company Law: A Case-Based Approach’ ed. Mathias Siems – David Cabrelli. (2018), 211-249.
  • Ivanaj, Silvester et al. ‘MNEs and climate change: Implications for future research’. Journal of Cleaner Production 160, (2017), 1-7.
  • Ivanaj, Vera et al., ‘Understanding MNEs' attitudes towards CSR: a literature review and research agenda’. Rev. Org. Responsab 8/2, (2013), 15-30.
  • İspirli Armağan, Merve. Uluslararası Hukukta Çok Uluslu Şirketler ve İnsan Hakları Yükümlülükleri. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 2019.
  • Kaal, Wulf A. ‘Blockchain-Based Corporate Governance’. U of St. Thomas (Minnesota) Legal Studies, Research Paper No. 19-05, (2019).
  • Kandemir, Hatice Kübra. ‘Sürdürülebı̇lı̇r Şı̇rketler ve Hukukı̇ Çerçevesı̇’. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 20/41 (2021).
  • Kaya, Serkan. ‘Blokzincir Tabanlı Akıllı Sözleşmelerden Doğan Uyuşmazlıkların Çözümü’. Medeni Usul ve İcra İflas Hukuku Dergisi 18/52, (2022).
  • Kaya, Serkan – Maviş, Kadirhan. ‘Blokzincir Teknolojilerinin Uyuşmazlık Çözüm Sistemleri Üzerindeki Etkisi: Merkezi Olmayan Adalet Sistemi’. Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 2/10, (2022).
  • Kaya, Serkan – Şahin Şentürk, Eda. ‘Global Class Actions: Towards a Blockchain-Based Dispute Resolution System’. Journal Consumer Policy (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-023-09553-8
  • Kelsey, Tom. ‘The present and future of techno-scepticism: two books on the dangers of technology’. Renewal: a Journal of Social Democracy 26/4, (2018), 92-95.
  • Khare, Anshuman et al. Sustainable International Business Models in a Digitally Transforming World. London: Routledge, 2022.
  • Kleinert, Jörn et al. ‘The Few Leading the Many: Foreign Affiliates and Business Cycle Comovement’. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 7/4, (2015), 134-59.
  • Kraakman, Reinier et al. The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2017.
  • Kyove, Justine et al. ‘Globalization Impact on Multinational Enterprises’. World 2/2 (15 April 2021), 216–230. https://doi.org/10.3390/world2020014
  • Jensen, Michael C. ‘Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function’. Business Ethics Quarterly 12/2, (2002), 235-256.
  • Lafarre, Anne. ‘Mandatory Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence in Europe: The Way Forward’. ECGI 2022. https://ecgi.global/blog/mandatory-corporate-sustainability-due-diligence-europe-way-forward.
  • Lafarre, Anne – Van der Elst, Christoph. ‘The Viability of Blockchain in Corporate Governance’ ECGI Working Paper Series in Law 712 (2023), https://www.ecgi.global/sites/default/files/working_papers/documents/theviabilityofblockchainincorporategovernance_0.pdf.
  • Liu, Shaojun. (2021). Code Is Law. In: Rights Limitation in Digital Age. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4380-4_7
  • Lopes, Alexsandro Broede – Walker, Martin. ‘Asset Revaluations, Future Firm Performance and Firm-Level Corporate Governance Arrangements: New Evidence from Brazil’. The British Accounting Review, 44 (2012).
  • Low, Kelvin F.K, et al. The company and blockchain technology. Northampton:Edward Elgard Handbook on Corporate Liability,. ed. Christian Witting – Martin Petrin. Edward Elgar, 2023.
  • Lowe, Nichola – Kenney, Martin. ‘Foreign Investment and The Global Geography of Production: Why the Mexican Consumer Electronics Industry Failed’. World Development 27, (1999).
  • Masulis, Ronald W. et al. ‘Director Liability Protection and the Quality of Outside Directors’ (December 9, 2020). European Corporate Governance Institute – Finance Working Paper No. 672/2020, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3329220 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3329220.
  • Meyer, Klaus E. et al. ‘Multinational Enterprises and Local Contexts: The Opportunities and Challenges of Multiple Embeddedness’. Journal of Management Studies 48/2 (March 2011), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00968.x
  • Möslein, Florian. ‘Robots in the Boardroom: Artificial Intelligence and Corporate Law’, Research Handbook on the Law of Artificial Intelligence. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2018.
  • Muchlinski, Peter. Multinational Enterprises and the Law. Oxford University Press, 2nd Ed., 2007.
  • Muchlinski, Peter. ‘Limited Liability and Multinational Enterprises: A Case for Reform?’. Cambridge Journal of Economics 34, (2010), 915-928.
  • Murray, Alex et al. ‘Contracting in the Smart Era: The Implications of Blockchain and Decentralized Autonomous Organizations for Contracting and Corporate Governance’. ACAD. MGMT. PERSP. 35, (2021).
  • Narula, Rajneesh – Pineli André. 'Improving the developmental impact of multinational enterprises: policy and research challenges’. Economia e Politica Industriale 46, (2019), 2.
  • Och, Marleen. ‘The Case of the Missing Shareholders in the Proposed Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive. ECGI 2022. https://ecgi.global/blog/case-missing-shareholders-proposed-corporate-sustainability-due-diligence-directive
  • OECD, The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Annual Report on the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. OECD, 2020. https://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/annualreportsontheguidelines.htm
  • OECD, The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Environment and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: Corporate Tools and Approaches. Accessed 3 August 2023. https://www.oecd.org/env/34992954.pdf
  • OECD, The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Multinational Enterprises In The Global Economy: Heavily Debated But Hardly Measured. OECD, 2018. https://www.oecd.org/industry/ind/MNEs-in-the-global-economy-policy-note.pdf
  • OECD, The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, 2011 Edition. OECD, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264115415-en
  • Oetzel, Jennifer – Doh, Jonathan P. 'MNEs and development: a review and reconceptualization'. Journal of World Business 44, (2009).
  • Oliveira, Rui Torres et al. ‘Blockchain and the multinational enterprise: Progress, challenges and future research avenues’. Review of International Business and Strategy 30/2, (2020), 145-161.
  • Rabinovich-Einy, Orna – Katsh, Ethan. ‘Blockchain and the Inevitability of Disputes: The Role for Online Dispute Resolution’. Journal Dispute Resolution 2, (2019), 47-75.
  • Pacces, Alessio M. ‘Supply Chain Liability in The Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive Proposal’. Oxford Law Faculty, 2022. https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/business-law-blog/blog/2022/04/supply-chain-liability-corporate-sustainability-due-diligence
  • Pargendler, Mariana. ‘The EU Proposal on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence and The Mystique of Complete Corporate Separateness’, ECGI 2022. https://ecgi.global/blog/eu-proposal-corporate-sustainability-due-diligence-and-mystique-complete-corporate-separateness?mc_cid=a63892fc3f&mc_eid=cd8cf5092d
  • Pargendler, Mariana. ‘How Universal is the Corporate Form? Reflections on the Dwindling of Corporate Attributes in Brazil’. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 58/1, (2019).
  • Pelker, C. Alden et. al. ‘Using Blockchain Analysis from Investigation to Trial’. DOJ J. FED. L. & PRAC. 69/59, (2021).
  • Petri, Helo – Yuqiuge, Hao. ‘Blockchains in operations and supply chains: A model and reference implementation’. Computers & Industrial Engineering 136, (2019).
  • Petrin, Martin. ‘Corporate Management in the Age of AI’, Columbia Business Law Review 3, (2020), 965–1030.
  • Pinkse, Jonatan – Kolk, Ans. ‘Multinational enterprises and climate change: Exploring institutional failures and embeddedness’. Journal of International Business Studies 43, (2012), 334.
  • Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence and Amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:bc4dcea4-9584-11ec-b4e4-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF
  • Pulaşlı, Hasan. ‘Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Bağlamında Uluslararası İnsan Hakları ve Çevre Standartlarının Çok Uluslu Şirketlerin Merkez Yönetim Organının Hukuki Sorumluluğuna Etkisi’. Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Dergisi 36/4, (2020), 5-37.
  • Reyes, Carla L. ‘Autonomous Corporate Personhood’. Washington Law Review 96/4, (2021).
  • Rooij, Benjamin Van – Brownlee, Megan. ‘Does Tort Deter? Inconclusive empirical evidence about the effect of liability in preventing harmful behavior’. Cambridge Handbook on Compliance, ed. Benjamin Van Rooij – D. Daniel Sokol, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
  • Ruggie, John Gerard. Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights (Norton Global Ethics Series). New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2013.
  • Ruggie, John. ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy: a Framework for Business And Human Rights, Report Of The Special Representative Of The Secretary-General On The Issue Of Human Rights Transantional Corporations And Other Business Enterprises’. U.N. Human Rights Council 8th Session, Agenda item 3 A/HRC/8/5 (7 April 2008), 3.
  • Schmitz, Amy J. – Rule, Colin. ‘Online Dispute Resolution for Smart Contracts’. Journal of Dispute Resolution 2, (2019).
  • Shope, Mark L. ‘Distributed Ledger Technology in International Trade: Rethinking the Role and Necessity of the Customs Declaration’. Stanford Journal of Blockchain Law & Policy 5/1, (2022).
  • Schotter, Andreas –Goodsite, Michael Evan. ‘Interdisciplinary perspectives on competitive climate strategy in multinational corporations’. Thunderbird Int. Bus. Rev. 55/6, (2013), 629-632.
  • Sjåfjell, Beate – Mähönen, Jukka. 'Corporate Purpose and the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Proposal’. ECGI 2022. https://ecgi.global/blog/corporate-purpose-and-eu-corporate-sustainability-due-diligence-proposal
  • Steinhardt, Ralph G. ‘Soft Law, Hard Markets: Comparative Self-Interest and the Emergence of Human Rights Responsibilities for Multinational Corporations’. Brook. J. Int'l L. 33, (2008), 936.
  • Strange, Roger. ‘MNE theory and the importance of corporate governance’. Academy of International Business (AIB) 2016 Annual Meeting, 27-30 Jun 2016, New Orleans.
  • Surden, Harry. ‘Artificial Intelligence And Law: An Overview’, Georgia State University Law Review 35, (2019).
  • Sutherland, Eversheds. 'Brexit Risk For Owners Of English Companies Operating In Germany- Publications – Eversheds Sutherland'. Eversheds-sutherland.com, 2022. https://www.eversheds-sutherland.com/global/en/what/articles/index.page?ArticleID=en/Corporate/Brexit_risk_for_owners_of_English_companies_operating_in_Germany
  • The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), Trustees of Dartmouth Coll. v. Woodward, 17 U.S.518, 636 (1819).
  • Thomsen, Steen. ‘Sustainable Corporate Governance and the Road to Stagnation’. Oxford Law Faculty, 2022. https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/business-law-blog/blog/2022/04/sustainable-corporate-governance-and-road-stagnation
  • Tyrrell, James. “Blockchain-Based Cross-Border Payments – the Ripple Effect” (TechHQ, July 24, 2023). https://techhq.com/2023/07/blockchain-based-cross-border-payments-the-ripple-effect/
  • Yunhan, Duan – Wenjin, Jiang. ‘Research on the Human Rights Responsibility of MNEs’. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research 615, (2021), 1331-1337.
  • UN, United Nations. Multinational Corporations in World Development. New York: UNDESA—United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 1973.
  • Vermont Act No 205 (S.269), An act relating to blockchain business development. https://legislature.vermont.gov/Documents/2018/Docs/ACTS/ACT205/ACT205%20As%20Enacted.pdf
  • Vicente, Lecia. ‘The Hohfeldian Concept of Share in Limited Liability Companies: A View from the Common and Civil Law Traditions’. Tul. Eur. & Civ. L.F. 33, (2018), 41-74
  • Wallach, Omri. ‘The World’s Tech Giants, Compared to the Size of Economies’. Visual Capitalist, 2021. https://www.visualcapitalist.com/the-tech-giants-worth-compared-economies-countries/
  • Welzel, Christian et al. ‘Mythos Blockchain: Herausforderung Für Den Öffentlichen Sektor’. Kompetenzzentrum Öffentliche Informationstechnologie, DIN, (2017).
  • Wu, Jiangong et al. ‘Enterprise data security storage integrating blockchain and artificial intelligence technology in property and resource risk management’. Soft Computing 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-08933-z.
  • Xia, Jianting et al. ‘The Effect of Blockchain Technology on Supply Chain Collaboration: A Case Study of Lenovo’. Systems 11/299, (2023).
  • Zagelmeyer, Stefan –Sinkovics, Rudolf R. ‘MNEs, Human Rights and the SDGs — the Moderating Role of Business and Human Rights Governance’. Transnational Corporations 26/33, (2019).
  • Zetzsche, Dirk A et al. ‘The Distributed Liability of Distributed Ledgers: Legal Risks of Blockchain’. University of Illinois Law Review (2018).
  • Zekos, Georgios. MNEs in the 21st Century. Nova Publishers, 2015.
  • Zhang, Wenbin et al. ‘Blockchain-Based Distributed Compliance in Multinational Corporations’ Cross-Border Intercompany Transactions: A New Model for Distributed Compliance Across Subsidiaries in Different Jurisdictions’. 508–517. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Singapore, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03405-4_20
  • 'Blockchain for Supply Chain- IBM Blockchain’. https://www.ibm.com/blockchain-supply-chain ‘Can Blockchain Revolutionize International Trade?’. Theblockchaintest.com, 2022. https://theblockchaintest.com/uploads/resources/WTO%20-%20Can%20Blockchain%20revolutionize%20international%20trade%20-%202018.pdf
  • ‘Civil Liability in the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive Proposal’. Oxford Law Blogs, September 22, 2023. https://blogs.law.ox.ac.uk/oblb/blog-post/2023/09/civil-liability-eu-corporate-sustainability-due-diligence-directive-proposal
  • 'LVMH Partners with Other Major Luxury Companies on Aura, the First Global Luxury Blockchain – LVMH' (LVMH, April 20, 2021). https://www.lvmh.com/news-documents/news/lvmh-partners-with-other-major-luxury-companies-on-aura-the-first-global-luxury-blockchain/
  • ‘Reino De España V. American Bureau of Shipping, Inc., 729 F. Supp. 2D 635’. Casetext.com, 2010. https://casetext.com/case/reino-de-espana-v-american-bureau-of-shipping
  • ‘Reporting’. Sustainable Performance, 2021. https://sustainable-performance.totalenergies.com/en/reporting. ‘Starbucks C.A.F.E. Practices’. Scsglobalservices, 2019. https://www.scsglobalservices.com/services/starbucks-cafe-practices?scscertified=1 ‘Shell Sustainability Report 2020 – Home’. Reports.shell.com, 2021. https://reports.shell.com/sustainability-report/2022/
  • ‘The Prestige: One Year On, A Continuing Disaster’. wfpanda.org, 2003. https://wwf.panda.org/wwf_news/?9623/The-IPrestigeI-one-year-on-a-continuing-disaster ‘Texts Adopted – Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence – Thursday, 1 June 2023’. European Union, 2023 – Source: European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2023-0209_EN.html
  • ‘Vechain | Blockchain for Our Better World’. vechain, March 9, 2023. https://www.vechain.org
  • ‘Unlimited Personal Liability of Shareholders in Air Berlin PLC as a Result of BREXIT?’. Heuking.de, 2022. https://www.heuking.de/de/news-events/newsletter-fachbeitraege/artikel/unlimited-personal-liability-of-shareholders-in-air-berlin-plc-as-a-result-of-brexit.html

Toplam 126 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Hukuk (Diğer)
BölümAraştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Meltem Karatepe Kaya İSTANBUL MEDENİYET ÜNİVERSİTESİ 0000-0003-3428-0293 Türkiye

Erken Görünüm Tarihi31 Aralık 2023
Yayımlanma Tarihi31 Aralık 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi10 Kasım 2023
Kabul Tarihi30 Aralık 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

ISNADKaratepe Kaya, Meltem. “Impacts of Emerging Technologies on Multinational Enterprises: Legal Challenges and Opportunities”. Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 11/2 (Aralık 2023), 1458-1501. https://doi.org/10.56701/shd.1389227.

Download or read online: Click here