Influence of mechanochemical treatment and oxygen inhibited layer on the adhesion of self-adhesive resin cement to bulk-fill composite resin

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2, 79 – 84, 30.06.2024

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1375582

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Sarrett DC. Clinical challenges and the relevance of sulphide methacrylate materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2005; 21: 9-20.
  • 2. Leprince JG, Palin WM, Vanacker J, Sabbagh J, Devaux J, Leloup G. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites. J Dent 2014; 42: 993-1000.
  • 3. Panchal AC, Asthana G. Oxygen inhibition layer: A dilemma to be solved. J Conserv Dent. 2020; 23: 254-258.
  • 4. Suh BI. Oxygen-inhibited layer in adhesion dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004; 16: 316-323.
  • 5. Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJ. Self‐adhesive resin cements – chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil. 2011; 38: 295-314.
  • 6. Cotes C, Cardoso M, Melo RM, Valandro LF, Bottino MA. Effect of composite surface treatment and aging on the bond strength between a core build-up composite and a luting agent. J Appl Oral Sci. 2015; 23: 71-78.
  • 7. Chen KK, Chen JH, Wu JH, Du JK. Influence of commercial adhesive with/without silane on the bond strength of resin-based composite repaired within twenty four hours. J Dent Sci. 2021; 16: 877-884.
  • 8. Bonstein T, Garlapo D, Donarummo J Jr, Bush PJ. Evaluation of varied repair protocols applied to aged composite resin. J Adhes Dent. 2005; 7: 41-49.
  • 9. Ghivari S, Chandak M, Manvar N. Role of oxygen inhibited layer on shear bond strength of composites. J Conserv Dent. 2010; 13: 39-41.
  • 10. Papacchini F, Dall’Oca S, Chieffi N, Goracci C, Sadek FT, Suh BI, et al. Composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of a microfilled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition. J Adhes Dent. 2007; 9: 25-31.
  • 11. Musanje L, Shu M, Darvell BW. Water sorption and mechanical behaviour of cosmetic direct restorative materials in artificial saliva. Dent Mater. 2001; 17: 394-401.
  • 12. Gregson K, Beiswanger AJ, Platt J. The impact of sorption, buffering, and proteins on leaching of organic and inorganic substances from dental resin core material. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008; 84: 256-264.
  • 13. Söderholm KJ, Mukherjee R, Longmate J. Filler leachability of composites stored in distilled water or artificial saliva. J Dent Res. 1996; 75: 1692-1699.
  • 14. Dos Santos VH, Griza S, de Moraes RR, Faria-E-Silva AL. Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to composite submitted to different surface pretreatments. Restor Dent Endod. 2014; 39: 12-16.
  • 15. Melo MA, Moysés MR, Santos SG, Alcântara CE, Ribeiro JC. Effects of different surface treatments and accelerated artificial aging on the bond strength of composite resin repairs. Braz Oral Res. 2011; 25: 485-491.
  • 16. Rodrigues SA Jr, Ferracane JL, Della Bona A. Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater 2009; 25:442-451.
  • 17. Akgül S, Kedici Alp C, Bala O. Repair potential of a bulk-fill resin composite: Effect of different surface-treatment protocols. Eur J Oral Sci. 2021; 129: e12814.
  • 18. Costa TR, Ferreira SQ, Klein-Júnior CA, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Durability of surface treatments and intermediate agents used for repair of a polished composite. Oper Dent. 2010; 35: 231-237.
  • 19. Cho SD, Rajitrangson P, Matis BA, Platt JA. Effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser, air abrasion, and silane application on repaired shear bond strength of composites. Oper Dent. 2013; 38: E1-E9.
  • 20. Nagasawa Y, Eda Y, Shigeta H, Ferrari M, Nakajima H, Hibino Y. Effect of sandblasting and/or priming treatment on the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to CAD/CAM blocks. Odontology. 2022; 110: 70-80.
  • 21. Lung CY, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: an overview. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 467-477.
  • 22. Guiterrez NC, Moecke SE, Caneppele TM, Perote LC, Batista GR, Huhtalla MF et al. Bond strength of composite resin restoration repair: influence of silane and adhesive systems. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019; 20: 880-886.
  • 23. Papacchini F, Monticelli F, Hasa I, Radovic I, Fabianelli A, Polimeni A, et al. Effect of air-drying temperature on the effectiveness of silane primers and coupling blends in the repair of a microhybrid resin composite. J Adhes Dent. 2007; 9: 391-397.

Influence of mechanochemical treatment and oxygen inhibited layer on the adhesion of self-adhesive resin cement to bulk-fill composite resin

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2, 79 – 84, 30.06.2024

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1375582

Öz

Objectives: This study evaluated the shear bond strength (SBS) of self-adhesive resin cements (SARC) to bulk-fill composite resins (BFCR) following mechanical and chemical surface treatments.
Materials and Methods: The BFCR discs fabricated were divided into four groups, based on the presence or absence oxygen inhibited layer (OIL) and mechanical surface treatment, as follows; group I: OIL+no surface treatment (NT), group II: no OIL+NT, group III: no OIL+diamond abrasive (DA), group IV: no OIL+air abrasion (AA). Each group was further divided into two subgroups based on chemical treatment using a silane agent. Following this, SARC cylinders were bonded to the surfaces of the treated BFCR samples. SBS was evaluated for all samples and failure analysis was carried out. The data were analyzed using independent t-test, one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test, and a p value of

Download or read online: Click here