Introduction: Marxifying IR, IRifying Marxism

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 82, 5 – 20, 12.06.2024

https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.1480444

Öz

Although the neglect of Marxism has been a pervasive characteristic of IR theory, there has been a marked revival of interest in Marxism. Marx’s materialist insights into the general historical development of societies, as well as his critique of capitalism and political economy, have served as alternative starting points for different critical approaches to IR and offers a welcome alternative to neorealism, constructivism, and poststructuralism that have dominated IR for several decades. Marxism provides a redefinition of IR by focusing on changes in material circumstances, historical conditions, and society instead of assuming unchanging and fixed structures of anarchy or the state. Marx’s analysis and insights into the dynamics of international relations have become even more important given the ongoing crisis of neoliberal capitalism, the rise of authoritarianism, right-wing nationalist populisms, and the racial and gendered subordinations accompanying them pointing to the importance of Marxifying IR and IRifying Marxism.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Marxism, Critical Realism, Political Marxism, Uneven and Combined Development, Gramscianism, Ecofeminism

Kaynakça

  • Acharya, Amitav and Barry Buzan. 2019. The Making of Global International Relations: Origins and Evolution of IR at its Centenary. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Allinson, Jamie and Alexander Anievas. 2010. Approaching the ‘international’: Beyond Political Marxism. In Marxism and World Politics: Contesting Global Capitalism, ed. Alexander Anievas. London and New York, Routledge.
  • Anderson, Kevin. 2010. Marx at the Margins: On Nationalism, Ethnicity and Non-Western Societies. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  • Anievas, Alexander. 2010. The Renaissance of Historical Materialism in International Relations Theory: An Introduction. In Marxism and World Politics: Contesting Global Capitalism, ed. Alexander Anievas. London and New York, Routledge: 1-10.
  • Anievas, Alexander and Kerem Nişancıoğlu. 2015. How the West Came to Rule: The Geopolitical Origins of Capitalism. London, Pluto Books.
  • Anievas, Alexander and Kerem Nişancıoğlu. 2016. Why Europe? Anti-Eurocentric Theory, History, and the Rise of Capitalism. Spectrum Journal of Global Studies 8, 1: 70-98.
  • Apeldoorn, Bastiaan. 2004a. Theorizing the Transnational: a Historical Materialist Approach. Journal of International Relations and Development 7: 142-176
  • Apeldoorn, Bastiaan. 2014. Geopolitical Strategy and Class Hegemony: Towards a Historical Materialist Analysis. Spectrum: Journal of Global Studies 6, 1: 1-20.
  • Banaji, Jairus. 2010. Theory as History: Essays on Modes of Production and Exploitation. Leiden. Brill. Berki, R.N. 1971. On Marxian Thought and the Problem of International Relations. World Politics 24, 1: 80-105.
  • Bhaskar, Roy 1979. A Realist Theory of Science. Sussex, Harvester Press.
  • Bottomore, Tom B. 1978. Karl Marx: Sociologist or Marxist. In Marx: Sociology, Change, Capitalism, ed. Donald McQuarrie. London, Quartet Books: 281-292.
  • Brincat, Shanon. 2010. Towards a Social-relational Dialectics for World Politics. European Journal of International Relations 17, 4: 679-680.
  • Callinicos, Alex. 2007. Does Capitalism Need the State System? Cambridge Review of International Affairs 20, 4: 533-549.
  • Cox, Robert. 2002. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. In Neorealism and Its Critics, ed. Robert O. Keohane. New York, Columbia University Press: 204-253.
  • Cudworth, Erika and Stephen Hobden. 2014. Analysing Change: Complex Rather Than Dialectical. Globalizations 11, 5: 1-16
  • Craven, Sean. 2015. The “Two Marxisms” Revisited: Humanism, Structuralism and Realism in Marxist Social Theory. Journal of Critical Realism 14, 1: 7-53.
  • Dufour, G. Frederick. 2008. Historical Materialism and International Relations. In Critical Companion to Contemporary Marxism, ed. Jacques Bidet and Statis Kouvekalis. Leiden, Boston, Brill Publishers: 453-470.
  • Engels, Friedrich. 1934. A Letter to Hans Starkenburg: Engels on Historical Materialism. New International 1, 3: 81–85.
  • Engels, Friedrich. Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy: Part IVhttps://www. marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1886/ludwig feuerbach/ch04.htm(accessed February 8, 2024).
  • Gallie, Walter Bryce. 1978. Marx and Engels on Revolution and War. In Philosophers of Peace and War: Kant, Clausewitz, Marx, Engels, and Tolstoy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 66-99.
  • Gilbert, Allen. 1980. Marx on Internationalism and War. In Marx, Justice and History, eds. Marshall Cohen, Thomas Nagel and Thomas Scanlon. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 185-211.
  • Gills, Barry K. 1987. Historical Materialism and International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 16, 2: 265-270.
  • Halliday, Fred. 1994. A Necessary Encounter: Historical Materialism and International Relations. In Rethinking International Relations. London, Macmillan: 47-73
  • Harvey, David. 2003. The New Imperialism. Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press.
  • Heine, Christian and Benno Teschke. 1996. Sleeping Beauty and the Dialectical Awakening: On the Potential of Dialectic for International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 25, 2: 399-423.
  • Hobson, John, 2004. The Eastern Origins of Western Civilization. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Hobson, John. 2011. What’s at Stake in the Neo-Trotskyist Debate? Towards a Non-Eurocentric Historical Sociology of Uneven and Combined Development. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 40, 1: 147–166.
  • Hobson, John M. 2012. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Jessop, Bob. 2008. State Power: A Strategic-Relational Approach. Cambridge, Polity.
  • Joseph, Jonathan. 2000. A Realist Theory of Hegemony. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 30, 2: 179-202
  • Joseph, Jonathan. 2008. Hegemony and the Structure-agency Problem in International Relations: a Scientific Realist Contribution. Review of International Studies 34: 109-128.
  • Joseph, Jonathan. 2010. The International as Emergent: Challenging Old and New Orthodoxies in International Relations Theory. In Scientific Realism and International Relations, eds. Jonathan Joseph and Colin Wight. London, Palgrave Macmillan: 51-68.
  • Lacher, Hannes. 2002. Making Sense of the International System: The Promises and Pitfalls of Contemporary Marxist Theories of International Relations. In Historical Materialism and Globalization, eds. Mark Rupert ve Hazel Smith. London and New York, Routledge: 146-164.
  • Lacher, Hannes and Benno Teschke. 2007. The Changing ‘Logics’ of Capitalist Competition. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 20, 4: 564-580.
  • Lenin, V. I.1965. Imperialism: The Highest State of Capitalism. Beijing, Foreign Language Press.
  • Maclean, John. 1981. Marxist Epistemology, Explanations of ‘Change’ and the Study of International Relations. In Change and the Study of International Relations: The Evaded Dimension, eds. Barry Buzan and R.J. Barry Jones. NY, St. Martin’s Press: 46-67.
  • Martin, Gabriel Pozo. 2007. Autonomous or Materialist Geopolitics. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 20, 4: 551-563.
  • Marx-Engels Correspondence. 1890 / 1934. Engels to J. Bloch. New International, 1, 3: 81-85; https:// www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1890/letters/90_09_21a.htm/ (accessed January 15, 2024)
  • Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels. 1974. The German Ideology. In Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels: The German Ideology, ed. Chris J. Arthur. London, Lawrence and Wishart: 37-119.
  • Marx, Karl. 1974. Theses on Feuerbach. In Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels: The German Ideology, ed. Chris J. Arthur. London, Lawrence, and Wishart: 121-124.
  • Marx, Karl. 1963. Capital. Moscow, Foreign Languages Publishing House.
  • Marx, Karl. 1993. Grundrisse. London, Penguin.
  • Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels.1996a. Manifesto of the Communist Party. In Marx: Later Political Writings, ed. Terry Carver. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 1-30.
  • Marx, Karl. 1996b. The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In Marx: Later Political Writings, ed. Terry Carver. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 31-127.
  • Marx, Karl. 1996c. “Preface” to the Contribution of Political Economy. In Marx: Later Political Writings, ed. Terry Carver. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 158-162.
  • Miliband, Ralph. 1965. Marx and the State. In The Socialist Register, eds. Ralph Miliband and John Saville. London, Merlin Press.
  • Ollman, Bertell. 2014. Dialectics and World Politics. Globalizations 11, 5: 573-579
  • Ollman, Bertell. 2003. Dance of the Dialectic: Steps in Marx’s Method. Urbana, University of Illinois Press.
  • Pal, Maïa. 2018. Introducing Marxism in International Relations Theory. E-IR. February 25.
  • Rosenberg, Justin. 1994. The Empire of Civil Society. London and New York, Verso.
  • Rosenberg, Justin. 2006. Why is There No International Historical Sociology. European Journal of International Relations 12, 3: 307-340.
  • Rosenberg, Justin. 2012. The ‘Philosophical Premises’ of Uneven and Combined Development. Review of International Studies 39, 3: 1-29.
  • Rupert, Mark. 1993. Alienation, Capitalism and the Inter-state System: Towards a Marxian/Gramscian Critique. In Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations, ed. Stephen Gill.
  • Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 67–92.
  • Rupert, Mark 2010. Marxism and Critical Theory. In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, eds. Tim Dunne et.al. Oxford, and New York, Oxford University Press.
  • Sayer, Derek. 1979. Marx’s Method: Ideology, Science and Critique in Capital. Atlantic Highlands, Harvester Press.
  • Sayer, Derek. 1987. The Violence of Abstraction: The Analytical Foundations of Historical Materialism. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
  • Selwyn, Benjamin. 2015. Twenty-first-century International Political Economy: A Class-relational Perspective. European Journal of International Relations 21, 3: 513–537.
  • Teschke, Benno. 2003. The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics and the Making of Modern International Relations. London, Verso.
  • Teschke, Benno. 2006. Geopolitics. Historical Materialism 14, 1: 327–335.
  • Teschke, Benno. 2008. Marxism. In The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, eds. C. Reus Smit and David Snidal. New York, Oxford University Press: 163-187.
  • Teschke, Benno. 2014. IR Theory, Historical Materialism and the False Promise of International Historical Sociology. Spectrum: Journal of Global Studies 6, 1: 1-66.
  • Teschke, Benno and Can Cemgil. 2014. The Dialectic of the Concrete: Reconsidering Dialectic for IR and Foreign Policy Analysis. Globalizations 11, 5: 605-625.
  • Teschke, Benno. 2016. Rethinking International Relations: An Interview with Benno Teschke. Viewpoint Magazine. August 18.
  • Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974. The Modern World System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the 16th Century. New York, Academic Press.
  • Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York, McGraw Hill.
  • Wendt, Alex. 1987. The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory. International Organization 41, 3: 335-370.
  • Wood, Ellen Meiksins. 1981. The Separation of the Economic and the Political in Capitalism. New Left Review 127: 66-95.
  • Yalvaç, Faruk. 1991. Sociology of the State and Sociology of International Relations. In State and Society in International Relations, eds. Michael Banks and Martin Shaw. London, Palgrave Macmillan/ Harvester Wheatsheaf: 93-114.
  • Yalvaç, Faruk. 2010. Critical Realism, International Relations Theory and Marxism. In Scientific Realism and International Relations, eds. Jonathan Joseph and Colin Wight. New York, Palgrave Macmillan: 167-185.
  • Yalvaç, Faruk. 2017. Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Marksizm: Marksizmi Uluslararasılaştırmak ve Marksist bir Uluslararası İlişkiler Kuramına Doğru [International Relations and Marxism: Internationalising Marxism and Toıwards a Marxist Theory of International Relations]. In Marksizm ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Kuramları, ed. Faruk Yalvaç. Ankara, İmge: 9-66.
  • Yalvaç, Faruk. 2021. Introduction: Politik Marksizm, Tarihsel Sosyoloji ve Uluslararası İlişkiler [Political Marxism, Historical Sociology and International Relation]. In Uluslararası Tarihsel Sosyoloji [International Historical Sociology], ed. Benno Teschke. Ankara, Nika: 7-16.

Introduction: Marxifying IR, IRifying Marxism

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 82, 5 – 20, 12.06.2024

https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.1480444

Öz

Although the neglect of Marxism has been a pervasive characteristic of IR theory, there has been a marked revival of interest in Marxism. Marx’s materialist insights into the general historical development of societies, as well as his critique of capitalism and political economy, have served as alternative starting points for different critical approaches to IR and offers a welcome alternative to neorealism, constructivism, and poststructuralism that have dominated IR for several decades. Marxism provides a redefinition of IR by focusing on changes in material circumstances, historical conditions, and society instead of assuming unchanging and fixed structures of anarchy or the state. Marx’s analysis and insights into the dynamics of international relations have become even more important given the ongoing crisis of neoliberal capitalism, the rise of authoritarianism, right-wing nationalist populisms, and the racial and gendered subordinations accompanying them pointing to the importance of Marxifying IR and IRifying Marxism.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Marxism, Critical Realism, Political Marxism, Uneven and Combined Development, Gramscianism, Ecofeminism

Kaynakça

  • Acharya, Amitav and Barry Buzan. 2019. The Making of Global International Relations: Origins and Evolution of IR at its Centenary. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Allinson, Jamie and Alexander Anievas. 2010. Approaching the ‘international’: Beyond Political Marxism. In Marxism and World Politics: Contesting Global Capitalism, ed. Alexander Anievas. London and New York, Routledge.
  • Anderson, Kevin. 2010. Marx at the Margins: On Nationalism, Ethnicity and Non-Western Societies. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  • Anievas, Alexander. 2010. The Renaissance of Historical Materialism in International Relations Theory: An Introduction. In Marxism and World Politics: Contesting Global Capitalism, ed. Alexander Anievas. London and New York, Routledge: 1-10.
  • Anievas, Alexander and Kerem Nişancıoğlu. 2015. How the West Came to Rule: The Geopolitical Origins of Capitalism. London, Pluto Books.
  • Anievas, Alexander and Kerem Nişancıoğlu. 2016. Why Europe? Anti-Eurocentric Theory, History, and the Rise of Capitalism. Spectrum Journal of Global Studies 8, 1: 70-98.
  • Apeldoorn, Bastiaan. 2004a. Theorizing the Transnational: a Historical Materialist Approach. Journal of International Relations and Development 7: 142-176
  • Apeldoorn, Bastiaan. 2014. Geopolitical Strategy and Class Hegemony: Towards a Historical Materialist Analysis. Spectrum: Journal of Global Studies 6, 1: 1-20.
  • Banaji, Jairus. 2010. Theory as History: Essays on Modes of Production and Exploitation. Leiden. Brill. Berki, R.N. 1971. On Marxian Thought and the Problem of International Relations. World Politics 24, 1: 80-105.
  • Bhaskar, Roy 1979. A Realist Theory of Science. Sussex, Harvester Press.
  • Bottomore, Tom B. 1978. Karl Marx: Sociologist or Marxist. In Marx: Sociology, Change, Capitalism, ed. Donald McQuarrie. London, Quartet Books: 281-292.
  • Brincat, Shanon. 2010. Towards a Social-relational Dialectics for World Politics. European Journal of International Relations 17, 4: 679-680.
  • Callinicos, Alex. 2007. Does Capitalism Need the State System? Cambridge Review of International Affairs 20, 4: 533-549.
  • Cox, Robert. 2002. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. In Neorealism and Its Critics, ed. Robert O. Keohane. New York, Columbia University Press: 204-253.
  • Cudworth, Erika and Stephen Hobden. 2014. Analysing Change: Complex Rather Than Dialectical. Globalizations 11, 5: 1-16
  • Craven, Sean. 2015. The “Two Marxisms” Revisited: Humanism, Structuralism and Realism in Marxist Social Theory. Journal of Critical Realism 14, 1: 7-53.
  • Dufour, G. Frederick. 2008. Historical Materialism and International Relations. In Critical Companion to Contemporary Marxism, ed. Jacques Bidet and Statis Kouvekalis. Leiden, Boston, Brill Publishers: 453-470.
  • Engels, Friedrich. 1934. A Letter to Hans Starkenburg: Engels on Historical Materialism. New International 1, 3: 81–85.
  • Engels, Friedrich. Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy: Part IVhttps://www. marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1886/ludwig feuerbach/ch04.htm(accessed February 8, 2024).
  • Gallie, Walter Bryce. 1978. Marx and Engels on Revolution and War. In Philosophers of Peace and War: Kant, Clausewitz, Marx, Engels, and Tolstoy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 66-99.
  • Gilbert, Allen. 1980. Marx on Internationalism and War. In Marx, Justice and History, eds. Marshall Cohen, Thomas Nagel and Thomas Scanlon. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 185-211.
  • Gills, Barry K. 1987. Historical Materialism and International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 16, 2: 265-270.
  • Halliday, Fred. 1994. A Necessary Encounter: Historical Materialism and International Relations. In Rethinking International Relations. London, Macmillan: 47-73
  • Harvey, David. 2003. The New Imperialism. Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press.
  • Heine, Christian and Benno Teschke. 1996. Sleeping Beauty and the Dialectical Awakening: On the Potential of Dialectic for International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 25, 2: 399-423.
  • Hobson, John, 2004. The Eastern Origins of Western Civilization. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Hobson, John. 2011. What’s at Stake in the Neo-Trotskyist Debate? Towards a Non-Eurocentric Historical Sociology of Uneven and Combined Development. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 40, 1: 147–166.
  • Hobson, John M. 2012. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Jessop, Bob. 2008. State Power: A Strategic-Relational Approach. Cambridge, Polity.
  • Joseph, Jonathan. 2000. A Realist Theory of Hegemony. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 30, 2: 179-202
  • Joseph, Jonathan. 2008. Hegemony and the Structure-agency Problem in International Relations: a Scientific Realist Contribution. Review of International Studies 34: 109-128.
  • Joseph, Jonathan. 2010. The International as Emergent: Challenging Old and New Orthodoxies in International Relations Theory. In Scientific Realism and International Relations, eds. Jonathan Joseph and Colin Wight. London, Palgrave Macmillan: 51-68.
  • Lacher, Hannes. 2002. Making Sense of the International System: The Promises and Pitfalls of Contemporary Marxist Theories of International Relations. In Historical Materialism and Globalization, eds. Mark Rupert ve Hazel Smith. London and New York, Routledge: 146-164.
  • Lacher, Hannes and Benno Teschke. 2007. The Changing ‘Logics’ of Capitalist Competition. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 20, 4: 564-580.
  • Lenin, V. I.1965. Imperialism: The Highest State of Capitalism. Beijing, Foreign Language Press.
  • Maclean, John. 1981. Marxist Epistemology, Explanations of ‘Change’ and the Study of International Relations. In Change and the Study of International Relations: The Evaded Dimension, eds. Barry Buzan and R.J. Barry Jones. NY, St. Martin’s Press: 46-67.
  • Martin, Gabriel Pozo. 2007. Autonomous or Materialist Geopolitics. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 20, 4: 551-563.
  • Marx-Engels Correspondence. 1890 / 1934. Engels to J. Bloch. New International, 1, 3: 81-85; https:// www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1890/letters/90_09_21a.htm/ (accessed January 15, 2024)
  • Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels. 1974. The German Ideology. In Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels: The German Ideology, ed. Chris J. Arthur. London, Lawrence and Wishart: 37-119.
  • Marx, Karl. 1974. Theses on Feuerbach. In Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels: The German Ideology, ed. Chris J. Arthur. London, Lawrence, and Wishart: 121-124.
  • Marx, Karl. 1963. Capital. Moscow, Foreign Languages Publishing House.
  • Marx, Karl. 1993. Grundrisse. London, Penguin.
  • Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels.1996a. Manifesto of the Communist Party. In Marx: Later Political Writings, ed. Terry Carver. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 1-30.
  • Marx, Karl. 1996b. The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In Marx: Later Political Writings, ed. Terry Carver. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 31-127.
  • Marx, Karl. 1996c. “Preface” to the Contribution of Political Economy. In Marx: Later Political Writings, ed. Terry Carver. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 158-162.
  • Miliband, Ralph. 1965. Marx and the State. In The Socialist Register, eds. Ralph Miliband and John Saville. London, Merlin Press.
  • Ollman, Bertell. 2014. Dialectics and World Politics. Globalizations 11, 5: 573-579
  • Ollman, Bertell. 2003. Dance of the Dialectic: Steps in Marx’s Method. Urbana, University of Illinois Press.
  • Pal, Maïa. 2018. Introducing Marxism in International Relations Theory. E-IR. February 25.
  • Rosenberg, Justin. 1994. The Empire of Civil Society. London and New York, Verso.
  • Rosenberg, Justin. 2006. Why is There No International Historical Sociology. European Journal of International Relations 12, 3: 307-340.
  • Rosenberg, Justin. 2012. The ‘Philosophical Premises’ of Uneven and Combined Development. Review of International Studies 39, 3: 1-29.
  • Rupert, Mark. 1993. Alienation, Capitalism and the Inter-state System: Towards a Marxian/Gramscian Critique. In Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations, ed. Stephen Gill.
  • Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 67–92.
  • Rupert, Mark 2010. Marxism and Critical Theory. In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, eds. Tim Dunne et.al. Oxford, and New York, Oxford University Press.
  • Sayer, Derek. 1979. Marx’s Method: Ideology, Science and Critique in Capital. Atlantic Highlands, Harvester Press.
  • Sayer, Derek. 1987. The Violence of Abstraction: The Analytical Foundations of Historical Materialism. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
  • Selwyn, Benjamin. 2015. Twenty-first-century International Political Economy: A Class-relational Perspective. European Journal of International Relations 21, 3: 513–537.
  • Teschke, Benno. 2003. The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics and the Making of Modern International Relations. London, Verso.
  • Teschke, Benno. 2006. Geopolitics. Historical Materialism 14, 1: 327–335.
  • Teschke, Benno. 2008. Marxism. In The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, eds. C. Reus Smit and David Snidal. New York, Oxford University Press: 163-187.
  • Teschke, Benno. 2014. IR Theory, Historical Materialism and the False Promise of International Historical Sociology. Spectrum: Journal of Global Studies 6, 1: 1-66.
  • Teschke, Benno and Can Cemgil. 2014. The Dialectic of the Concrete: Reconsidering Dialectic for IR and Foreign Policy Analysis. Globalizations 11, 5: 605-625.
  • Teschke, Benno. 2016. Rethinking International Relations: An Interview with Benno Teschke. Viewpoint Magazine. August 18.
  • Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974. The Modern World System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the 16th Century. New York, Academic Press.
  • Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York, McGraw Hill.
  • Wendt, Alex. 1987. The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory. International Organization 41, 3: 335-370.
  • Wood, Ellen Meiksins. 1981. The Separation of the Economic and the Political in Capitalism. New Left Review 127: 66-95.
  • Yalvaç, Faruk. 1991. Sociology of the State and Sociology of International Relations. In State and Society in International Relations, eds. Michael Banks and Martin Shaw. London, Palgrave Macmillan/ Harvester Wheatsheaf: 93-114.
  • Yalvaç, Faruk. 2010. Critical Realism, International Relations Theory and Marxism. In Scientific Realism and International Relations, eds. Jonathan Joseph and Colin Wight. New York, Palgrave Macmillan: 167-185.
  • Yalvaç, Faruk. 2017. Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Marksizm: Marksizmi Uluslararasılaştırmak ve Marksist bir Uluslararası İlişkiler Kuramına Doğru [International Relations and Marxism: Internationalising Marxism and Toıwards a Marxist Theory of International Relations]. In Marksizm ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Kuramları, ed. Faruk Yalvaç. Ankara, İmge: 9-66.
  • Yalvaç, Faruk. 2021. Introduction: Politik Marksizm, Tarihsel Sosyoloji ve Uluslararası İlişkiler [Political Marxism, Historical Sociology and International Relation]. In Uluslararası Tarihsel Sosyoloji [International Historical Sociology], ed. Benno Teschke. Ankara, Nika: 7-16.

Toplam 72 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Uluslararası Siyaset
BölümMakaleler
Yazarlar

Faruk Yalvaç ATILIM UNIVERSITY 0000-0002-7788-8672 Türkiye

Jonathan Joseph Bristol University 0000-0002-4578-211X United Kingdom

Yayımlanma Tarihi12 Haziran 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi15 Nisan 2024
Kabul Tarihi7 Mayıs 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 21 Sayı: 82

Kaynak Göster

APAYalvaç, F., & Joseph, J. (2024). Introduction: Marxifying IR, IRifying Marxism. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 21(82), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.1480444
AMAYalvaç F, Joseph J. Introduction: Marxifying IR, IRifying Marxism. uidergisi. Haziran 2024;21(82):5-20. doi:10.33458/uidergisi.1480444
ChicagoYalvaç, Faruk, ve Jonathan Joseph. “Introduction: Marxifying IR, IRifying Marxism”. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 21, sy. 82 (Haziran 2024): 5-20. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.1480444.
EndNoteYalvaç F, Joseph J (01 Haziran 2024) Introduction: Marxifying IR, IRifying Marxism. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 21 82 5–20.
IEEEF. Yalvaç ve J. Joseph, “Introduction: Marxifying IR, IRifying Marxism”, uidergisi, c. 21, sy. 82, ss. 5–20, 2024, doi: 10.33458/uidergisi.1480444.
ISNADYalvaç, Faruk – Joseph, Jonathan. “Introduction: Marxifying IR, IRifying Marxism”. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 21/82 (Haziran 2024), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.1480444.
JAMAYalvaç F, Joseph J. Introduction: Marxifying IR, IRifying Marxism. uidergisi. 2024;21:5–20.
MLAYalvaç, Faruk ve Jonathan Joseph. “Introduction: Marxifying IR, IRifying Marxism”. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, c. 21, sy. 82, 2024, ss. 5-20, doi:10.33458/uidergisi.1480444.
VancouverYalvaç F, Joseph J. Introduction: Marxifying IR, IRifying Marxism. uidergisi. 2024;21(82):5-20.

Download or read online: Click here