Restoration manager: Adapting project delivery methods for the restoration of architectural heritage

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 265 – 281, 30.04.2024

https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1386599

Öz

The restoration of architectural heritage is a complex process and presents intricate and formidable challenges. The project delivery method plays a pivotal role for the success of the restoration process. There exists a diverse array of project delivery methods, each characterized by its distinct set of advantages and disadvantages. In the context of architectural heritage restoration, given its distinct characteristics, these advantages and disadvantages encompass a wide spectrum. Current project delivery methods, while effective for certain contexts, often fall short in addressing the unique requisites of restoration projects. Acknowledging this inadequacy, this article undertakes a research that includes a literature review that not only examines prevailing project delivery methods but also articulates the need for a tailored framework within the restoration field. This article is produced from the doctoral thesis titled “Development of a Sustainable Integrated Management System for the Conservation of Architectural Heritage”, which is in the process of preparation. In the light of the results of the survey which is conducted within the scope of the first author’s doctoral study in order to examine the project delivery approach preferred among the participants that are working in the field of the conservation of architectural heritage, a project delivery method called “Restoration Manager”, which has been precisely prepared to meet the requirements inherent in restoration initiatives, is presented. This comprehensive project delivery method seeks to fill the void by addressing the distinct needs and challenges encountered in restoration projects. The essence of this work is to create an appropriate project delivery system that adapts to the nuances of the restoration works, and through this project delivery framework, the restoration processes and outcomes will successfully be completed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Project management, Project delivery methods, Architectural heritage, Restoration manager

Kaynakça

  • Antón, A. J. M., Rodríguez, G. S., & López, Á. R. (2011). Financial risks in construction projects. African Journal of Business Management, 5(31), 12325- 12328. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.1463
  • Oyetunji, A. A., & Anderson, S. D. (2006). Relative effectiveness of project delivery and contract strategies. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:1(3)
  • Azar, E., O'Brien, W., Carlucci, S., Hong, T., Sonta, A., Kim, J., … & Zhou, J. (2020). Simulation-aided occupant-centric building design: A critical review of tools, methods, and applications. Energy and Buildings, 224, 110292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110292
  • Hong, H. K., Kim, J. S., Kim, T., & Leem, B. H. (2008). The effect of knowledge on system integration project performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108(3), 385-404. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570810858787
  • Ojiako, U., Johansen, E., & Greenwood, D. (2008). A qualitative re‐construction of project measurement criteria. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108(3), 405-417. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570810858796
  • Ahmed, S., & El-Sayegh, S. (2020). Critical review of the evolution of project delivery methods in the construction industry. Buildings, 11(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11010011
  • Noor, M. I. M., Rahim, F. A. M., & Abd Karim, S. B. (2022). Project Delivery Method for Construction Projects: Review of Malaysian Public Sector Practice. Journal Of Project Management Practice (JPMP), 2(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.22452/jpmp.vol2no1.1
  • Kubba, S. (2012) Handbook of Green Building Design and Construction. Elsevier, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385128-4.00003-2
  • Khan, M. A., & Phil, M. (2015). Chapter 3 – Research and Training in ABC Structural Systems. Accelerated Bridge Construction, 103-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407224-4.00003-4
  • Flanagan, R., & Jewell, C. (2018). Procurement, selection, contractual arrangements and legal issues. New Code of Estimating Practice The Chartered Institute of Building, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119329671.ch7
  • Rwelamila, P. D., & Edries, R. (2007). Project procurement competence and knowledge base of civil engineering consultants: An empirical study. Journal of Management in Engineering, 23(4), 182-192. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2007)23:4(182)
  • Franz, B., Molenaar, K. R., & Roberts, B. A. (2020). Revisiting project delivery system performance from 1998 to 2018. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(9), 04020100. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.000189
  • Haugen, A., Wondimu, P. A., Lohne, J., & Lædre, O. (2017). Project delivery methods in large public road projects–a case study of E6 Jaktøyen-Sentervegen. Procedia Engineering, 196, 391-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.215
  • McCollough, E. (2021). Industry Perceptions on Public Sector Construction Delivery Methods.
  • Ren, R., & Zhang, J. (2021). A new framework to address BIM interoperability in the AEC domain from technical and process dimensions. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8824613
  • CMAA (Construction Management Association of America). (2012). An owner’s guide to project delivery methods.
  • Cooper, S. (2002). Project delivery techniques for historic structures: A case study. In 2002 Annual Conference, 7, 950.
  • Kubba, S. (2017). Types of Building Contract Agreements. Handbook of Green Building Design and Construction, 747–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-810433-0.00014-9
  • Hallowell, M., & Toole, T. M. (2009). Contemporary design-bid-build model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(6), 540-549. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:6(540)
  • Lam, E. W., Chan, A. P., & Chan, D. W. (2008). Determinants of successful design-build projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and management, 134(5), 333-341. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:5(333)
  • Neidert, A. E. (2012). Analysis of the Texas A&M University System’s construction. [Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University].
  • Nouh Meshref, A., Elkasaby, E. A., & Wageh, O. (2021). Identifying innovative reliable criteria governing the selection of infrastructures construction project delivery systems. Open Engineering, 11(1), 269-280. https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2021-0028
  • Shane, J. S., & Gransberg, D. D. (2010). A critical analysis of innovations in construction manager-at-risk project delivery. In Construction Research Congress 2010: Innovation for Reshaping Construction Practice, 827-836. https://doi.org/10.1061/41109(373)83
  • Kahvandi, Z., Saghatforoush, E., Alinezhad, M., & Noghli, F. (2017). Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) Research Trends. Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 7(2), 99-114.
  • Jackson, B. J. (2020). Construction management JumpStart: the best first step toward a career in construction management. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Prajapati, T. (2021). Alliance Models and Lean Construction in Construction Projects. [Master’s Thesis, Metropolia University of Applied Sciences].
  • Cassell, J. W., & Gilday, L. T. (1997). Improving the Army's Job Order Contracting Program, McLean, VA: Logistics Management Institute.
  • Nath, A. (2021). Analysing Learners Perception about Data Analysis on Microsoft Excel. Learning Community: An International Journal on Educational and Social Development,12(2), 95-100. https://doi.org/10.30954/2231-458X.02.2021.2
  • Masood, A., & Lodhi, R. N. (2016). Determinants of behavioral intentions to use SPSS among students: Application of Technology Acceptance model (TAM). FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 146
  • Arslan, R., & Ökten, A. (1994). Araştırma Yöntemleri. İstanbul: Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi.
  • Neumann, W. L. (2000). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon
  • Farrell, P. (2011). Writing a built environment dissertation: practical guidance and examples. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Garner, B., Richardson, K., & Castro-Lacouture, D. (2008). Design-build project delivery in military construction: Approach to best value procurement. Journal for the Advancement of Performance Information and Value, 1(1), 35-50.
  • Rahola, T. B. S., & Straub, A. (2013). Project delivery methods in European social housing energy renovations. Property Management, 31(3), 216-232. https://doi.org/10.1108/02637471311321469
  • Syed Zubir, S. Z., Mohd Nawi, M. N., Abdul Nifa, F. A., & Bahaudin, A. Y. (2018). An overview of project delivery methods in construction industry. International Journal of Supply Chain Management (IJSCM), 7(6), 177-182.
  • Koolwijk, J. S. J., van Oel, C. J., Wamelink, J. W. F., & Vrijhoef, R. (2018). Collaboration and integration in project-based supply chains in the construction industry. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34(3), 04018001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000592
  • Kwak, Y. H., & Bushey, R. (2000). Construction management at risk: an innovative project delivery method at stormwater treatment area in the Everglades, Florida. In Construction Congress VI: Building Together for a Better Tomorrow in an Increasingly Complex World, 477-482. https://doi.org/10.1061/40475(278)52
  • Burkhart, D. (2016). CMAR Project Delivery Method Facilitates the Construction of a Large-Diameter Pipeline and Treatment Plant Upgrade Project, Allowing Timely Access to Much-Needed Water Resources in North Texas. Pipelines, 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479957.006
  • El Asmar, M., Ariaratnam, S. T., & Francom, T. (2016). Improving Cost and Schedule Performance on Municipal Pipeline Projects: Realizing the Benefits of the Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) Alternative Project Delivery Method. GeoStrata Magazine Archive, 20(4), 50-56. https://doi.org/10.1061/geosek.0000341
  • Sherif, M., Abotaleb, I., & Alqahtani, F. K. (2022). Application of integrated project delivery (IPD) in the middle east: Implementation and challenges. Buildings, 12(4), 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12040467
  • El Asmar, M., & Hanna, A. S. (2012). Comparative analysis of integrated project delivery (IPD) cost and quality performance. In Proceedings of the CIB W, 78.
  • Kent, D. C., & Becerik-Gerber, B. (2010). Understanding construction industry experience and attitudes toward integrated project delivery. Journal of construction engineering and management, 136(8), 815-825. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000188
  • Kelly, D., & Ilozor, B. (2022). Performance outcome assessment of the integrated project delivery (IPD) method for commercial construction projects in USA. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(14), 2808-2816. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1827340
  • Mesa, H. A., Molenaar, K. R., & Alarcón, L. F. (2016). Exploring performance of the integrated project delivery process on complex building projects. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), 1089-1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.05.007
  • Moradi, S., & Kähkönen, K. (2022). Success in collaborative construction through the lens of project delivery elements. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 12(6), 973-991. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-09-2021-0118
  • Gould, F. E. (2005). Managing the construction process. Pearson Education India.
  • Burján, T. (2016). Procurement-& Contract models for Construction-& Infrastructure projects in the Semiconductor industry. [Doctoral dissertation, Wien].
  • Hale, D. R., Shrestha, P. P., Gibson Jr, G. E., & Migliaccio, G. C. (2009). Empirical comparison of design/build and design/bid/build project delivery methods. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(7), 579-587. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000017
  • Suratkon, A., Yunus, R., & Deraman, R. (2020). Characteristics of Procurement Methods in Malaysia -Comparing Design-Bid-Build, Design-Build and Construction Management. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 11(3), 1-11.
  • Ling, F. Y. Y., & Kerh, S. H. (2004). Comparing the performance of design-build and design-bid-build building projects in Singapore. Architectural Science Review, 47(2), 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2004.9697040
  • Bo, X., & Chan, A. P. (2008). The Investigation of Design-Build Variants in Construction Market of the People’Republic of China. In Proc. First International Conference on Construction in Developing Countries (ICCIDC-1), 384-391.
  • Park, H. S., Lee, D., Kim, S., & Kim, J. L. (2015). Comparing project performance of design-build and design-bid-build methods for large-sized public apartment housing projects in Korea. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 14(2), 323-330. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.14.323
  • Shrestha, P. P., & Batista, J. R. (2022). Transition from traditional to alternative project delivery methods in water and wastewater project: executive decision-makers' perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(7), 2665-2688. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-10-2020-0791
  • Lu, W., Hua, Y., & Zhang, S. (2017). Logistic regression analysis for factors influencing cost performance of design-bid-build and design-build projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(1), 118-132. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2015-0119
  • Hubbard, B., & Debs, L. (2022, November). Development of an Introductory Course in Design Phase Management for Constructors. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1101(3), 032030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1101/3/032030
  • Basir, W. N. F. W. A., Ujang, U., Majid, Z., Azri, S., & Choon, T. L. (2020). The integration of BIM and GIS in construction project–A data consistency review. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 44, 107-116. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIV-4-W3-2020-107-2020
  • Zhong, Q., Tang, H., Chen, C., & Igor, M. (2023). A comprehensive appraisal of the factors impacting construction project delivery method selection: A systematic analysis. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 22(2), 802-820. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2022.2060983
  • Yu, T., Shen, G. Q., & Shi, Q. (2017). Comparing the performance quality of design-bid-build and design-build delivery methods. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(4), 04016111. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001262
  • Zhang, Y., & Hu, H. (2020). Data envelopment analysis based efficiency measurement of engineering change controlling for infrastructure construction under integrated project delivery mode. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 14(11), 1433-1439. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2019.0779
  • Zhou, Y., Ding, L., Rao, Y., Luo, H., Medjdoub, B., & Zhong, H. (2017). Formulating project-level building information modeling evaluation framework from the perspectives of organizations: A review. Automation in construction, 81, 44-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.05.004
  • Omar, M. N., & Fayek, A. R. (2016). Modeling and evaluating construction project competencies and their relationship to project performance. Automation in Construction, 69, 115-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.05.021
  • Masterman, J. W. (2013). An introduction to building procurement systems. Routledge.
  • Pöyhönen, P., Sivunen, M., & Kajander, J. K. (2017). Developing a project delivery system for construction project–a case study. Procedia Engineering, 196, 520-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.233
  • Migliaccio, G. C., Gibson Jr, G. E., & O'connor, J. T. (2008). Changing project delivery strategy: An implementation framework. Public Works Management & Policy, 12(3), 483-502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X07311805
  • Fong, C. K., Avetisyan, H. G., & Cui, Q. (2014). Understanding the sustainable outcome of project delivery methods in the built environment. Organization, Technology & Management in Construction, 6(3), 1141-1155.
  • American Institute of Architects (2016). Primer on Project Delivery Terms. Joint Committee of the AIA and the AGC.
  • Demkin, J. A. (2001). The architect's handbook of professional practice. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Cheung, S. O., Lam, T. I., Wan, Y. W., & Lam, K. C. (2001). Improving objectivity in procurement selection. Journal of Management in Engineering, 17(3), 132-139. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2001)17:3(132)
  • Zhong, Q., Tang, H., & Chen, C. (2022). A framework for selecting construction project delivery method using design structure matrix. Buildings, 12(4), 443. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12040443
  • Korkmaz, S., Riley, D., & Horman, M. (2010). Piloting evaluation metrics for sustainable high-performance building project delivery. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(8), 877-885. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000195
  • Mafakheri, F., Dai, L., Slezak, D., & Nasiri, F. (2007). Project delivery system selection under uncertainty: Multicriteria multilevel decision aid model. Journal of Management in Engineering, 23(4), 200-206. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2007)23:4(200)
  • Elghaish, F., Hosseini, M. R., Talebi, S., Abrishami, S., Martek, I., & Kagioglou, M. (2020). Factors driving success of cost management practices in integrated project delivery (IPD). Sustainability, 12(22), 9539. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229539
  • Rodrigues, M. R., & Lindhard, S. M. (2023). Benefits and challenges to applying IPD: experiences from a Norwegian mega-project. Construction Innovation, 23(2), 287-305. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-03-2021-0042
  • Nifa, F. A. A., Nawi, M. N. M., Nadzri, W., & Osman, S. A. R. (2015). Towards development of sustainable design in Malaysian university campus: A preliminary framework for Universiti Utara Malaysia. Jurnal Teknologi, 77(5), 43-49.
  • Hamzeh, F., Rached, F., Hraoui, Y., Karam, A. J., Malaeb, Z., El Asmar, M., & Abbas, Y. (2019). Integrated project delivery as an enabler for collaboration: a Middle East perspective. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(3), 334-347. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-05-2018-0084
  • Gad, G. M., Adamtey, S. A., & Gransberg, D. D. (2015). Trends in quality management approaches to design–build transportation projects. Transportation Research Record, 2504(1), 87-92. https://doi.org/10.3141/2504-11
  • Jin, R., Zou, Y., Gidado, K., Ashton, P., & Painting, N. (2019). Scientometric analysis of BIM-based research in construction engineering and management. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(8), 1750-1776. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2018-0350
  • Khanna, M., Elghaish, F., McIlwaine, S., & Brooks, T. (2021). Feasibility of implementing ipd approach for infrastructure projects in developing countries. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 26, 902-921. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2021.048
  • Harjono, R., Gusfa, H., & Bintoro, B. P. K. (2021). Effect of ipd implementation and communication between contractor and owner on the success of a building project in jakarta barat. International Journal of Research and Review, 8(3), 51-57. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20210310
  • Ren, R., & Zhang, J. (2021). A new framework to address BIM interoperability in the AEC domain from technical and process dimensions. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8824613
  • Adamtey, S. (2021). Cost and time performance analysis of progressive design-build projects. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 19(3), 686-697. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-05-2020-0164
  • Zhang, K., Erfani, A., Beydoun, O., & Cui, Q. (2022). Procurement Benchmarks for Major Transportation Projects. Transportation Research Record, 2676(11), 363-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221092722
  • Hasanzadeh, S., Esmaeili, B., Nasrollahi, S., Gad, G., & Gransberg, D. (2018). Impact of Owners’ Early Decisions on Project Performance and Dispute Occurrence in Public Highway Projects. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000251
  • Zhang, Y., & Hu, H. (2020). Data envelopment analysis based efficiency measurement of engineering change controlling for infrastructure construction under integrated project delivery mode. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 14(11), 1433-1439. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2019.0779
  • Bilge, E. C., & Yaman, H. (2021). Information management roles in real estate development lifecycle: literature review on BIM and IPD framework. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 723-742. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-04-2019-0036
  • Gabel, M., Sujka, M., Davis, Z. W., & Keizur, A. E. (2023). Performance of Risk-Based Estimating for Capital Projects. Transportation Research Record, 2677(1), 1059-1070. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221103238

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 265 – 281, 30.04.2024

https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1386599

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Antón, A. J. M., Rodríguez, G. S., & López, Á. R. (2011). Financial risks in construction projects. African Journal of Business Management, 5(31), 12325- 12328. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.1463
  • Oyetunji, A. A., & Anderson, S. D. (2006). Relative effectiveness of project delivery and contract strategies. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:1(3)
  • Azar, E., O'Brien, W., Carlucci, S., Hong, T., Sonta, A., Kim, J., … & Zhou, J. (2020). Simulation-aided occupant-centric building design: A critical review of tools, methods, and applications. Energy and Buildings, 224, 110292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110292
  • Hong, H. K., Kim, J. S., Kim, T., & Leem, B. H. (2008). The effect of knowledge on system integration project performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108(3), 385-404. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570810858787
  • Ojiako, U., Johansen, E., & Greenwood, D. (2008). A qualitative re‐construction of project measurement criteria. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108(3), 405-417. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570810858796
  • Ahmed, S., & El-Sayegh, S. (2020). Critical review of the evolution of project delivery methods in the construction industry. Buildings, 11(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11010011
  • Noor, M. I. M., Rahim, F. A. M., & Abd Karim, S. B. (2022). Project Delivery Method for Construction Projects: Review of Malaysian Public Sector Practice. Journal Of Project Management Practice (JPMP), 2(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.22452/jpmp.vol2no1.1
  • Kubba, S. (2012) Handbook of Green Building Design and Construction. Elsevier, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385128-4.00003-2
  • Khan, M. A., & Phil, M. (2015). Chapter 3 – Research and Training in ABC Structural Systems. Accelerated Bridge Construction, 103-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407224-4.00003-4
  • Flanagan, R., & Jewell, C. (2018). Procurement, selection, contractual arrangements and legal issues. New Code of Estimating Practice The Chartered Institute of Building, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119329671.ch7
  • Rwelamila, P. D., & Edries, R. (2007). Project procurement competence and knowledge base of civil engineering consultants: An empirical study. Journal of Management in Engineering, 23(4), 182-192. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2007)23:4(182)
  • Franz, B., Molenaar, K. R., & Roberts, B. A. (2020). Revisiting project delivery system performance from 1998 to 2018. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(9), 04020100. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.000189
  • Haugen, A., Wondimu, P. A., Lohne, J., & Lædre, O. (2017). Project delivery methods in large public road projects–a case study of E6 Jaktøyen-Sentervegen. Procedia Engineering, 196, 391-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.215
  • McCollough, E. (2021). Industry Perceptions on Public Sector Construction Delivery Methods.
  • Ren, R., & Zhang, J. (2021). A new framework to address BIM interoperability in the AEC domain from technical and process dimensions. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8824613
  • CMAA (Construction Management Association of America). (2012). An owner’s guide to project delivery methods.
  • Cooper, S. (2002). Project delivery techniques for historic structures: A case study. In 2002 Annual Conference, 7, 950.
  • Kubba, S. (2017). Types of Building Contract Agreements. Handbook of Green Building Design and Construction, 747–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-810433-0.00014-9
  • Hallowell, M., & Toole, T. M. (2009). Contemporary design-bid-build model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(6), 540-549. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:6(540)
  • Lam, E. W., Chan, A. P., & Chan, D. W. (2008). Determinants of successful design-build projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and management, 134(5), 333-341. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:5(333)
  • Neidert, A. E. (2012). Analysis of the Texas A&M University System’s construction. [Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University].
  • Nouh Meshref, A., Elkasaby, E. A., & Wageh, O. (2021). Identifying innovative reliable criteria governing the selection of infrastructures construction project delivery systems. Open Engineering, 11(1), 269-280. https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2021-0028
  • Shane, J. S., & Gransberg, D. D. (2010). A critical analysis of innovations in construction manager-at-risk project delivery. In Construction Research Congress 2010: Innovation for Reshaping Construction Practice, 827-836. https://doi.org/10.1061/41109(373)83
  • Kahvandi, Z., Saghatforoush, E., Alinezhad, M., & Noghli, F. (2017). Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) Research Trends. Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 7(2), 99-114.
  • Jackson, B. J. (2020). Construction management JumpStart: the best first step toward a career in construction management. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Prajapati, T. (2021). Alliance Models and Lean Construction in Construction Projects. [Master’s Thesis, Metropolia University of Applied Sciences].
  • Cassell, J. W., & Gilday, L. T. (1997). Improving the Army's Job Order Contracting Program, McLean, VA: Logistics Management Institute.
  • Nath, A. (2021). Analysing Learners Perception about Data Analysis on Microsoft Excel. Learning Community: An International Journal on Educational and Social Development,12(2), 95-100. https://doi.org/10.30954/2231-458X.02.2021.2
  • Masood, A., & Lodhi, R. N. (2016). Determinants of behavioral intentions to use SPSS among students: Application of Technology Acceptance model (TAM). FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 146
  • Arslan, R., & Ökten, A. (1994). Araştırma Yöntemleri. İstanbul: Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi.
  • Neumann, W. L. (2000). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon
  • Farrell, P. (2011). Writing a built environment dissertation: practical guidance and examples. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Garner, B., Richardson, K., & Castro-Lacouture, D. (2008). Design-build project delivery in military construction: Approach to best value procurement. Journal for the Advancement of Performance Information and Value, 1(1), 35-50.
  • Rahola, T. B. S., & Straub, A. (2013). Project delivery methods in European social housing energy renovations. Property Management, 31(3), 216-232. https://doi.org/10.1108/02637471311321469
  • Syed Zubir, S. Z., Mohd Nawi, M. N., Abdul Nifa, F. A., & Bahaudin, A. Y. (2018). An overview of project delivery methods in construction industry. International Journal of Supply Chain Management (IJSCM), 7(6), 177-182.
  • Koolwijk, J. S. J., van Oel, C. J., Wamelink, J. W. F., & Vrijhoef, R. (2018). Collaboration and integration in project-based supply chains in the construction industry. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34(3), 04018001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000592
  • Kwak, Y. H., & Bushey, R. (2000). Construction management at risk: an innovative project delivery method at stormwater treatment area in the Everglades, Florida. In Construction Congress VI: Building Together for a Better Tomorrow in an Increasingly Complex World, 477-482. https://doi.org/10.1061/40475(278)52
  • Burkhart, D. (2016). CMAR Project Delivery Method Facilitates the Construction of a Large-Diameter Pipeline and Treatment Plant Upgrade Project, Allowing Timely Access to Much-Needed Water Resources in North Texas. Pipelines, 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479957.006
  • El Asmar, M., Ariaratnam, S. T., & Francom, T. (2016). Improving Cost and Schedule Performance on Municipal Pipeline Projects: Realizing the Benefits of the Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) Alternative Project Delivery Method. GeoStrata Magazine Archive, 20(4), 50-56. https://doi.org/10.1061/geosek.0000341
  • Sherif, M., Abotaleb, I., & Alqahtani, F. K. (2022). Application of integrated project delivery (IPD) in the middle east: Implementation and challenges. Buildings, 12(4), 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12040467
  • El Asmar, M., & Hanna, A. S. (2012). Comparative analysis of integrated project delivery (IPD) cost and quality performance. In Proceedings of the CIB W, 78.
  • Kent, D. C., & Becerik-Gerber, B. (2010). Understanding construction industry experience and attitudes toward integrated project delivery. Journal of construction engineering and management, 136(8), 815-825. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000188
  • Kelly, D., & Ilozor, B. (2022). Performance outcome assessment of the integrated project delivery (IPD) method for commercial construction projects in USA. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(14), 2808-2816. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1827340
  • Mesa, H. A., Molenaar, K. R., & Alarcón, L. F. (2016). Exploring performance of the integrated project delivery process on complex building projects. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), 1089-1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.05.007
  • Moradi, S., & Kähkönen, K. (2022). Success in collaborative construction through the lens of project delivery elements. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 12(6), 973-991. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-09-2021-0118
  • Gould, F. E. (2005). Managing the construction process. Pearson Education India.
  • Burján, T. (2016). Procurement-& Contract models for Construction-& Infrastructure projects in the Semiconductor industry. [Doctoral dissertation, Wien].
  • Hale, D. R., Shrestha, P. P., Gibson Jr, G. E., & Migliaccio, G. C. (2009). Empirical comparison of design/build and design/bid/build project delivery methods. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(7), 579-587. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000017
  • Suratkon, A., Yunus, R., & Deraman, R. (2020). Characteristics of Procurement Methods in Malaysia -Comparing Design-Bid-Build, Design-Build and Construction Management. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 11(3), 1-11.
  • Ling, F. Y. Y., & Kerh, S. H. (2004). Comparing the performance of design-build and design-bid-build building projects in Singapore. Architectural Science Review, 47(2), 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2004.9697040
  • Bo, X., & Chan, A. P. (2008). The Investigation of Design-Build Variants in Construction Market of the People’Republic of China. In Proc. First International Conference on Construction in Developing Countries (ICCIDC-1), 384-391.
  • Park, H. S., Lee, D., Kim, S., & Kim, J. L. (2015). Comparing project performance of design-build and design-bid-build methods for large-sized public apartment housing projects in Korea. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 14(2), 323-330. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.14.323
  • Shrestha, P. P., & Batista, J. R. (2022). Transition from traditional to alternative project delivery methods in water and wastewater project: executive decision-makers' perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(7), 2665-2688. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-10-2020-0791
  • Lu, W., Hua, Y., & Zhang, S. (2017). Logistic regression analysis for factors influencing cost performance of design-bid-build and design-build projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(1), 118-132. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2015-0119
  • Hubbard, B., & Debs, L. (2022, November). Development of an Introductory Course in Design Phase Management for Constructors. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1101(3), 032030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1101/3/032030
  • Basir, W. N. F. W. A., Ujang, U., Majid, Z., Azri, S., & Choon, T. L. (2020). The integration of BIM and GIS in construction project–A data consistency review. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 44, 107-116. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIV-4-W3-2020-107-2020
  • Zhong, Q., Tang, H., Chen, C., & Igor, M. (2023). A comprehensive appraisal of the factors impacting construction project delivery method selection: A systematic analysis. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 22(2), 802-820. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2022.2060983
  • Yu, T., Shen, G. Q., & Shi, Q. (2017). Comparing the performance quality of design-bid-build and design-build delivery methods. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(4), 04016111. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001262
  • Zhang, Y., & Hu, H. (2020). Data envelopment analysis based efficiency measurement of engineering change controlling for infrastructure construction under integrated project delivery mode. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 14(11), 1433-1439. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2019.0779
  • Zhou, Y., Ding, L., Rao, Y., Luo, H., Medjdoub, B., & Zhong, H. (2017). Formulating project-level building information modeling evaluation framework from the perspectives of organizations: A review. Automation in construction, 81, 44-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.05.004
  • Omar, M. N., & Fayek, A. R. (2016). Modeling and evaluating construction project competencies and their relationship to project performance. Automation in Construction, 69, 115-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.05.021
  • Masterman, J. W. (2013). An introduction to building procurement systems. Routledge.
  • Pöyhönen, P., Sivunen, M., & Kajander, J. K. (2017). Developing a project delivery system for construction project–a case study. Procedia Engineering, 196, 520-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.233
  • Migliaccio, G. C., Gibson Jr, G. E., & O'connor, J. T. (2008). Changing project delivery strategy: An implementation framework. Public Works Management & Policy, 12(3), 483-502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X07311805
  • Fong, C. K., Avetisyan, H. G., & Cui, Q. (2014). Understanding the sustainable outcome of project delivery methods in the built environment. Organization, Technology & Management in Construction, 6(3), 1141-1155.
  • American Institute of Architects (2016). Primer on Project Delivery Terms. Joint Committee of the AIA and the AGC.
  • Demkin, J. A. (2001). The architect's handbook of professional practice. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Cheung, S. O., Lam, T. I., Wan, Y. W., & Lam, K. C. (2001). Improving objectivity in procurement selection. Journal of Management in Engineering, 17(3), 132-139. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2001)17:3(132)
  • Zhong, Q., Tang, H., & Chen, C. (2022). A framework for selecting construction project delivery method using design structure matrix. Buildings, 12(4), 443. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12040443
  • Korkmaz, S., Riley, D., & Horman, M. (2010). Piloting evaluation metrics for sustainable high-performance building project delivery. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(8), 877-885. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000195
  • Mafakheri, F., Dai, L., Slezak, D., & Nasiri, F. (2007). Project delivery system selection under uncertainty: Multicriteria multilevel decision aid model. Journal of Management in Engineering, 23(4), 200-206. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2007)23:4(200)
  • Elghaish, F., Hosseini, M. R., Talebi, S., Abrishami, S., Martek, I., & Kagioglou, M. (2020). Factors driving success of cost management practices in integrated project delivery (IPD). Sustainability, 12(22), 9539. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229539
  • Rodrigues, M. R., & Lindhard, S. M. (2023). Benefits and challenges to applying IPD: experiences from a Norwegian mega-project. Construction Innovation, 23(2), 287-305. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-03-2021-0042
  • Nifa, F. A. A., Nawi, M. N. M., Nadzri, W., & Osman, S. A. R. (2015). Towards development of sustainable design in Malaysian university campus: A preliminary framework for Universiti Utara Malaysia. Jurnal Teknologi, 77(5), 43-49.
  • Hamzeh, F., Rached, F., Hraoui, Y., Karam, A. J., Malaeb, Z., El Asmar, M., & Abbas, Y. (2019). Integrated project delivery as an enabler for collaboration: a Middle East perspective. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(3), 334-347. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-05-2018-0084
  • Gad, G. M., Adamtey, S. A., & Gransberg, D. D. (2015). Trends in quality management approaches to design–build transportation projects. Transportation Research Record, 2504(1), 87-92. https://doi.org/10.3141/2504-11
  • Jin, R., Zou, Y., Gidado, K., Ashton, P., & Painting, N. (2019). Scientometric analysis of BIM-based research in construction engineering and management. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(8), 1750-1776. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2018-0350
  • Khanna, M., Elghaish, F., McIlwaine, S., & Brooks, T. (2021). Feasibility of implementing ipd approach for infrastructure projects in developing countries. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 26, 902-921. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2021.048
  • Harjono, R., Gusfa, H., & Bintoro, B. P. K. (2021). Effect of ipd implementation and communication between contractor and owner on the success of a building project in jakarta barat. International Journal of Research and Review, 8(3), 51-57. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20210310
  • Ren, R., & Zhang, J. (2021). A new framework to address BIM interoperability in the AEC domain from technical and process dimensions. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8824613
  • Adamtey, S. (2021). Cost and time performance analysis of progressive design-build projects. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 19(3), 686-697. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-05-2020-0164
  • Zhang, K., Erfani, A., Beydoun, O., & Cui, Q. (2022). Procurement Benchmarks for Major Transportation Projects. Transportation Research Record, 2676(11), 363-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221092722
  • Hasanzadeh, S., Esmaeili, B., Nasrollahi, S., Gad, G., & Gransberg, D. (2018). Impact of Owners’ Early Decisions on Project Performance and Dispute Occurrence in Public Highway Projects. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000251
  • Zhang, Y., & Hu, H. (2020). Data envelopment analysis based efficiency measurement of engineering change controlling for infrastructure construction under integrated project delivery mode. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 14(11), 1433-1439. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2019.0779
  • Bilge, E. C., & Yaman, H. (2021). Information management roles in real estate development lifecycle: literature review on BIM and IPD framework. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 723-742. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-04-2019-0036
  • Gabel, M., Sujka, M., Davis, Z. W., & Keizur, A. E. (2023). Performance of Risk-Based Estimating for Capital Projects. Transportation Research Record, 2677(1), 1059-1070. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221103238

Toplam 86 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Mimari Mühendislik, Yapı İşletmesi, İnşaat Mühendisliği (Diğer)
BölümArticles
Yazarlar

Mehmet Emre Aktuna ANKARA HACI BAYRAM VELI UNIVERSITY 0000-0002-3826-0962 Türkiye

Bekir Eskici ANKARA HACI BAYRAM VELI UNIVERSITY 0000-0003-2352-5080 Türkiye

Erken Görünüm Tarihi9 Nisan 2024
Yayımlanma Tarihi30 Nisan 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi6 Kasım 2023
Kabul Tarihi8 Aralık 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APAAktuna, M. E., & Eskici, B. (2024). Restoration manager: Adapting project delivery methods for the restoration of architectural heritage. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 8(2), 265-281. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1386599
AMAAktuna ME, Eskici B. Restoration manager: Adapting project delivery methods for the restoration of architectural heritage. TUJE. Nisan 2024;8(2):265-281. doi:10.31127/tuje.1386599
ChicagoAktuna, Mehmet Emre, ve Bekir Eskici. “Restoration Manager: Adapting Project Delivery Methods for the Restoration of Architectural Heritage”. Turkish Journal of Engineering 8, sy. 2 (Nisan 2024): 265-81. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1386599.
EndNoteAktuna ME, Eskici B (01 Nisan 2024) Restoration manager: Adapting project delivery methods for the restoration of architectural heritage. Turkish Journal of Engineering 8 2 265–281.
IEEEM. E. Aktuna ve B. Eskici, “Restoration manager: Adapting project delivery methods for the restoration of architectural heritage”, TUJE, c. 8, sy. 2, ss. 265–281, 2024, doi: 10.31127/tuje.1386599.
ISNADAktuna, Mehmet Emre – Eskici, Bekir. “Restoration Manager: Adapting Project Delivery Methods for the Restoration of Architectural Heritage”. Turkish Journal of Engineering 8/2 (Nisan 2024), 265-281. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1386599.
JAMAAktuna ME, Eskici B. Restoration manager: Adapting project delivery methods for the restoration of architectural heritage. TUJE. 2024;8:265–281.
MLAAktuna, Mehmet Emre ve Bekir Eskici. “Restoration Manager: Adapting Project Delivery Methods for the Restoration of Architectural Heritage”. Turkish Journal of Engineering, c. 8, sy. 2, 2024, ss. 265-81, doi:10.31127/tuje.1386599.
VancouverAktuna ME, Eskici B. Restoration manager: Adapting project delivery methods for the restoration of architectural heritage. TUJE. 2024;8(2):265-81.

Download or read online: Click here